2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability, liposome interaction, and in vivo pharmacology of ghrelin in liposomal suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, PC and SM formulation exhibited much lower entrapment efficiency (PC, 45.07±0.78%; SM, 50.03±7.55%), which were significantly lower than those of the SP, MPPC and DPPC formulations. These results were consistent with a previous report, in which there were markedly different interactions among peptides and various types of charged liposome (27). Therefore, the SP formulation was chosen to further optimize the entrapment conditions for producing liposomal ACEI peptides because of its higher efficiency and lower cost.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…By contrast, PC and SM formulation exhibited much lower entrapment efficiency (PC, 45.07±0.78%; SM, 50.03±7.55%), which were significantly lower than those of the SP, MPPC and DPPC formulations. These results were consistent with a previous report, in which there were markedly different interactions among peptides and various types of charged liposome (27). Therefore, the SP formulation was chosen to further optimize the entrapment conditions for producing liposomal ACEI peptides because of its higher efficiency and lower cost.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Indeed, the peptides described to be included in liposomes thus far are much longer (>20) compared to the ones (5–10 amino acids) used in the present study, e.g. appetite‐stimulating hormone ghrelin and peptidic antitumor agent Print 3G . In contrast, the incorporation of Ex527 using the ethanol injection method was highly efficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To our knowledge, only a limited number of studies have focused on the development of formulations containing Ghrl, and these were intended for parenteral administration. 14 The intravenous route, which is rather cumbersome for chronic administration, 15 has been the most exploited for Ghrl administration, 16 while intranasal delivery has been considered very rarely. A recently published study was focused on the nasal administration of a vaccine containing Ghrl-antigen for the management of obesity, but this was not intended for nose-brain delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%