2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability in a large drug treatment system: Examining the role of program size and performance on service discontinuation

Abstract: Background Little is known about the stability of public drug treatment in the United States to deliver services in an era of expansion of public insurance. Guided by organizational theories, we examined the role of program size, and performance (i.e., rates of treatment initiation and engagement) on discontinuing services in one of the largest treatment systems in the United States. Methods This study relied on multi-year (2006–2014) administrative data of 249,029 trea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown a lack of stability in treatment facilities in Los Angeles County, with 62% of programs closing in a 5-year period [ 40 ]. Although methadone programs were found to be more stable, the frequency of closures can be tied to significant changes in EDT to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown a lack of stability in treatment facilities in Los Angeles County, with 62% of programs closing in a 5-year period [ 40 ]. Although methadone programs were found to be more stable, the frequency of closures can be tied to significant changes in EDT to treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current substance use disorder (SUD) treatment system has struggled to meet the service needs of an increasingly diverse population [ 26 , 47 ], particularly those suffering from opioid use disorder (OUD; [ 25 , 30 ]. Because many SUD treatment programs are small and financially unstable, they face high risks of discontinuing services or reducing the quality of care [ 23 , 33 ]. Furthermore, low revenues and net assets are often reported as barriers to financing comprehensive services like mental health and social services [ 31 , 43 , 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%