2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability enhancement of the nitrogen-doped ITO thin films at high temperatures using two-step mixed atmosphere annealing technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TCR of most metal strain gauges can be defined according to Formula : TCR = normalΔ R / R 0 normalΔ T × 10 6 where R 0 is the original resistance of the TFSG at 25 °C and Δ R and Δ T are the relative resistance variations of the TFSG and the relative temperature variations of the testing environment, respectively. The resistance drift rate (DR) of strain gauges at high temperatures is defined by Formula : DR = normalΔ R R r e f × 1 normalΔ t where, at the constant temperature point, R ref and Δ R are, respectively, the initial resistance and the value of change in resistance of the TFSG and Δ t is the maintained time. The strain sensing performance of AgPd TFSG was tested by the cantilever beam method (Figure c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TCR of most metal strain gauges can be defined according to Formula : TCR = normalΔ R / R 0 normalΔ T × 10 6 where R 0 is the original resistance of the TFSG at 25 °C and Δ R and Δ T are the relative resistance variations of the TFSG and the relative temperature variations of the testing environment, respectively. The resistance drift rate (DR) of strain gauges at high temperatures is defined by Formula : DR = normalΔ R R r e f × 1 normalΔ t where, at the constant temperature point, R ref and Δ R are, respectively, the initial resistance and the value of change in resistance of the TFSG and Δ t is the maintained time. The strain sensing performance of AgPd TFSG was tested by the cantilever beam method (Figure c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%