2007
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta:20060299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability criteria for uncertain Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy systems with interval time-varying delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
92
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded that the obtained results in this paper are less conservative than those of [4,7], [34][35][36]. Moreover, if we assume timevarying delay .t/ satisfies (2), the delay-dependent fault estimation conditions proposed in [21][22][23][24][25], [27] fail to give a feasible solution.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be concluded that the obtained results in this paper are less conservative than those of [4,7], [34][35][36]. Moreover, if we assume timevarying delay .t/ satisfies (2), the delay-dependent fault estimation conditions proposed in [21][22][23][24][25], [27] fail to give a feasible solution.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, the interval OE 1 ; 2 is divided into two unequal variable subintervals OE 1 ; 1 C ı and OE 1 C ı; 2 .0 < < 1; ı D 2 1 / in which is a tunable parameter. It is clear that both the information of delayed state e n .t n N 1 /.n D 1; 2; 3; :::N / and e n .t 1 ı/.0 < < 1/ can be taken into account, the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional defined in Theorem 3.1 is more general than the one in [4][5][6][7], [34][35][36][37]. Therefore, the result of fault estimation of Theorem 3.1 and the stability criterion of Corollary 3.2 can further reduce the analysis and synthesis conservatism.…”
Section: Actuator Fault Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study in this paper makes some initial attempt to stability analysis for interval delayed T-S fuzzy systems. Although our modeling is for the T-S fuzzy systems with interval time-varying delays [12,21,22,27], it is also applicable to the uncertain systems in terms of [1,18] and the networked control systems [3,15,19], while the proposed results can be extended to H ∞ control [3,15,22,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such uncertainties may be due to measurement error, simplified models of natural laws, neglected dynamics, or inevitably uncertain model. In recent years, a variety of methodologies in robust control have been studied and proposed, such as adaptive control approach, differential inequality approach, sliding mode control approach, ∞ control approach, adaptive sliding mode control approach, time-domain approach, backstepping control approach, neural-fuzzy approach, LMI approach, and others; see, for instance [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and the references therein. In [8], based on the time-domain approach with differential inequality, a feedback control has been proposed to accomplish generalized exponential synchronization for a pair of mechanical systems with uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%