2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-013-0915-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability conditions and extremal contractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will therefore review these statements in more detail in Sect. 3 and Appendix 2; one can also deduce them with the same arguments as in the surface case, treated in detail in [44 …”
Section: Properties Of Tilt-stabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We will therefore review these statements in more detail in Sect. 3 and Appendix 2; one can also deduce them with the same arguments as in the surface case, treated in detail in [44 …”
Section: Properties Of Tilt-stabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…• A mathematical formulation of Denef-Moore's formula derived in the study of Ooguri-Strominger-Vafa's conjecture, relating black hole entropy and topological string, [Tod11a]; • The possibility to realize extremal contractions for threefolds as moduli spaces of semistable objects in the derived category, [Tod12b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this is not the case for an arbitrary projective surface, and we need to find a general argument proving such an inequality. In the previous paper [21], we established such a BG type inequality for semistable objects on an arbitrary projective surface, and proved the support property for some stability conditions in U (X). We use this result to show the support property for stability conditions contained in other subsets U(Y ).…”
Section: Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Motivation. This paper is a continuation of the previous paper [21], in which the following question on the relationship between minimal model program (MMP) and Bridgeland stability conditions [7] was addressed (cf. [21, Question 1.1]): Question 1.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%