2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability comparison between sample preparation procedures for mass spectrometry-based targeted or shotgun peptidomic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, natural hydrolysis of proteins can increase the complexity of data and is unfavorable for the study of endogenous peptides. Studies on humans and animals have shown that protease inhibitors alone are insufficient to prevent the degradation of endogenous peptides (Beaudry et al, 2010). Heating, such as through the use of a constant-temperature water bath, can effectively deactivate protein hydrolysis activity in samples by denaturing animal protein hydrolysis enzymes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, natural hydrolysis of proteins can increase the complexity of data and is unfavorable for the study of endogenous peptides. Studies on humans and animals have shown that protease inhibitors alone are insufficient to prevent the degradation of endogenous peptides (Beaudry et al, 2010). Heating, such as through the use of a constant-temperature water bath, can effectively deactivate protein hydrolysis activity in samples by denaturing animal protein hydrolysis enzymes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we described previously [Beaudry, 2010], tissue processing is an important step in preserving neuropeptides from in situ degradation. Mouse tissues were weighed accurately and homogenized using a tissue tearor following the addition of 0.25 % TFA solution at a ratio of 1:5 (w/v) resulting in a pH < 3.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptidomic analysis has been proposed by several authors [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] as a way to access information relevant to clinical diagnosis and/or to monitor the patient biochemical profile during the therapy. The growing interest in peptidomic analysis led some scientists to develop new analytical technologies to improve peptidomic analysis, such as: use of capillary electrophoresis to separate the peptides [46]; use of size exclusion chromatography as a pre-fractionation step [53,56]; new technologies and methods for sample pretreatment [57], such as methods for isolation rare amino acid-containing peptides, terminal peptides, PTM peptides and endogenous peptides, automated sample pretreatment technologies (automated sample injection and on-line digestion) [58]; development of a new target plate for MALDI-MS for one step electric transfer of analytes from a 1-dimensional electrophoresis gel directly to the target plate [59,60]; etc. In recent years, in the face of the remarkable development on nanotechnology, many researchers have produced different kind of nanoparticles, such as mesoporous silica nanoparticles [50,51,61,62] and carbon nanotubes [52,63], for selective peptide extraction (and, hence, its enrichment) from biological fluids for therapeutic purposes (clinical diagnosis and/or novel biomarker discovery).…”
Section: Proteomic and Peptidomic Analysis: A New Approach To Study Vmentioning
confidence: 99%