2011
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2010.2104167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and Fairness of AP Selection Games in IEEE 802.11 Access Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, a specific example is provided to demonstrate the throughput loss caused by performance anomaly. Consider a WLAN with 2 APs (AP1 and AP2) and 4 STAs, enumerated from 1 to 4, as depicted in Figure 1 [19]. STA1 and STA2 experience a bit rate of 11 Mbps from AP1, while STA4 also experiences a bit rate of 11 Mbps from AP2.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, a specific example is provided to demonstrate the throughput loss caused by performance anomaly. Consider a WLAN with 2 APs (AP1 and AP2) and 4 STAs, enumerated from 1 to 4, as depicted in Figure 1 [19]. STA1 and STA2 experience a bit rate of 11 Mbps from AP1, while STA4 also experiences a bit rate of 11 Mbps from AP2.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if it chooses AP2, it will have a bit rate of 1 Mbps, and when all STAs associating with AP2 have different bit rates, AP2 will suffer performance anomaly. The analysis from the experimental data in Table 1 demonstrates the performance anomaly that is a main factor to degrade system throughput [19].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cost function that each user aims at minimizing depends on the AP load and the distance the associating device needs to travel to be able to associate to the desired AP. Wi-Fi association is addressed through game-theoretic tools also in [26]- [28]. Those works consider noncooperative game models with the users trying to selfishly minimize a cost function that depends on the current congestion of the Wi-Fi access points.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WiFi association is addressed through game theoretic tools also in [25], [26], and [27]. All the three works consider noncooperative game models with the users trying to selfishly minimize a cost function that depends on the current congestion of the WiFi access points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%