2019
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2019.1575528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and convergence properties of forced infinite-dimensional discrete-time Lur'e systems

Abstract: Incremental stability and convergence properties for forced, infinite-dimensional, discretetime Lur'e systems are addressed. Lur'e systems have a linear and nonlinear component and arise as the feedback interconnection of a linear control system and a static nonlinearity. Discrete-time Lur'e systems arise in, for example, sampled-data control and integro-difference models. We provide conditions, reminiscent of classical absolute stability criteria, which are sufficient for a range of incremental stability prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sufficient conditions for the CICS property are obtained as a corollary. The relation between the present paper and our earlier work [5,13,14] is discussed in Remarks 3.3, 3.4 and 4.7.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sufficient conditions for the CICS property are obtained as a corollary. The relation between the present paper and our earlier work [5,13,14] is discussed in Remarks 3.3, 3.4 and 4.7.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although this stability notion is semi-global, it is suitable for almost all practical applications, as all relevant initial conditions and inputs are likely to have their norm bounded by some R > 0. We refer the reader to papers such as [2,13,14] for varying notions of global incremental stability.…”
Section: Incremental Stability Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence unique solutions of (2.3) exist, proving statement (1). To prove statement (2), we realize that the estimate (2.6) follows from an application of [13,Statement (ii) of Theorem 3.2] to (2. 19) and (2.20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19) and (2.20). We proceed to verify that the hypotheses of [13,Theorem 3.2] hold. To this end, we note that inequality (2.5) implies the existence of an ε > 0 such that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%