2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis of an open cracked rotor with the anisotropic rotational damping in rotating operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To detect the nonlinear responses of the system by the fourth order Runge-Kutta method are employed and by bifurcation diagrams, power spectrums, maximum Lyapunov exponent, phase portraits and Poincaré sections are reflected [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Saeed and Eissamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To detect the nonlinear responses of the system by the fourth order Runge-Kutta method are employed and by bifurcation diagrams, power spectrums, maximum Lyapunov exponent, phase portraits and Poincaré sections are reflected [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Saeed and Eissamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng H. C. et al [1] analyzed by perturbation method the stability of rotor with open crack and studied the damping effects with the distinction of stationary damping and the anisotropic rotating damping on the dynamic stability of the rotating rotor with an open crack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common methods to detect damage for structure of devices in the operation are dynamic methods using measured vibration data including the frequency measurements, mode shapes analysis, and other analysis of dynamic responses altered by the damage. 35 These researches mainly focus on the development of dynamic model to simulate the actual crack of structure or system 68 and acquire the modal parameters or vibration signatures with high precision which means the methods of signal processing. 9,10 But the sizes of the damage that can be detected by dynamic methods are relatively large compared with the detection of ultrasonic guided waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%