2015
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2015.2435031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability Analysis of a Planar Multiple-Beam Circuit for <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$W$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-Band High-Power Extended-Interaction Klystron

Abstract: Circuit analysis of a multiple-beam version of a high-power extended-interaction klystron is performed. The circuit is based on the barbell cavity with five coplanar electron beams across the transverse section of the cavity. Although the basic circuit design is straightforward, stable operation is challenging due to the mode competition and the self-oscillation in an oversized multiple-gap cavity driven by multiple beam sources. The 3-D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation technology and the space-charge wave th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In W-band or terahertz (THz) klystrons, the extended interaction cavity is widely used, which has the advantages of a large power capacity and a high characteristic impedance. Related research includes W-band pencil beam EIAs [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], W-band multi-beam EIAs [ 10 ], W-band sheet beam EIAs [ 11 ], G-band sheet beam EIAs [ 12 , 13 ], G-band pencil beam EIAs [ 14 , 15 ], and W-band tested EIKs [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In general, the sheet beam has a more uniform beam–wave interaction than the pencil beam, and the current density of the beam can be greatly decreased by the sheet beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In W-band or terahertz (THz) klystrons, the extended interaction cavity is widely used, which has the advantages of a large power capacity and a high characteristic impedance. Related research includes W-band pencil beam EIAs [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], W-band multi-beam EIAs [ 10 ], W-band sheet beam EIAs [ 11 ], G-band sheet beam EIAs [ 12 , 13 ], G-band pencil beam EIAs [ 14 , 15 ], and W-band tested EIKs [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In general, the sheet beam has a more uniform beam–wave interaction than the pencil beam, and the current density of the beam can be greatly decreased by the sheet beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power limitation imposed by crosssectional dimensions which shrink with wavelength can be overcome by using cavities and waveguides that are much larger than the wavelength in the transverse dimension due to operation in higher-order modes. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] By realizing the method of concentrating the axial field energy along the source's central axis within a large cavity, an oversized beam tunnel that can support efficient energy conversion between the intense electron beam and the high frequency field is designed. This overmoded structure has a far larger electron beam loading area than conventional structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the propagation of the electromagnetic waves in the beam tunnel is difficult to be cut off completely, which causes the signal feedback between cavities and results in the undesired oscillation. Another potential approach is to use the multi-beam interaction system to reduce the current density of beams [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%