2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566)
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2004.1390020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis for impedance control of robot for human-robot cooperative task system

Abstract: This paper presents stability analysis far an impedance control of a specific robot system in a bumanrobot caoper~tiw t a d system. In the stability analysis, we consider these conditions such as an impedance characteristic ofthe robot, time delay a l a human operator and a control of the robot, a compliance of structure of the robot, and an environment stiffness respectively. The stability analysis simulation reveals that these conditions have significant influence on the stability of the system lo order to i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
7

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
41
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) the stiffness of the human arm has the greatest effect on stability for a specific damping value, and (2) an increase in damping is sufficient to stabilize the robot [40]- [42]. The stiffness of operators increased while performing fine motions with particular precision [43].…”
Section: B Experimental Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) the stiffness of the human arm has the greatest effect on stability for a specific damping value, and (2) an increase in damping is sufficient to stabilize the robot [40]- [42]. The stiffness of operators increased while performing fine motions with particular precision [43].…”
Section: B Experimental Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compliance control system for "Mode B " is applied to change the joint 3 stiffness [10,11]. Figure 15 shows a block diagram of the control system.…”
Section: Control System Of "Mode B"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, designing the admittance controller for a low-effort task by selecting the desired inertia below the end-effector's physical inertia can lead to instability [12]. The interaction stability in such situations is greatly affected by the human limb stiffness [13] Attaching a passive compliant element to the end-effector and controlling the endpoint stiffness can improve the interaction stability in these cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%