2016
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2015.2459151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability Analysis and Control of Rigid-Body Systems With Impacts and Friction

Abstract: Abstract-Many critical tasks in robotics, such as locomotion or manipulation, involve collisions between a rigid body and the environment or between multiple bodies. Methods based on sums-of-squares (SOS) for numerical computation of Lyapunov certificates are a powerful tool for analyzing the stability of continuous nonlinear systems, and can additionally be used to automatically synthesize stabilizing feedback controllers. Here, we present a method for applying sums-of-squares verification to rigid bodies wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stepping events will be assumed to occur after a fixed period, T , and result in a discrete event with the post-step state given by a reset map x + = r(x − , s, Λ) for the foot location s ∈ [−1, 1] and impact impulse Λ ∈ R. Here, we take r(x − , s, Λ) to be affine in s. Note that some models will follow the traditional LIPM approach and assume zero impulse during stepping, and others will include impulsive impact forces transmitted through a massless leg. While, for models with impacts, it might be possible to explicitly define the impulse Λ, we instead will exploit an implicit definition of inelastic impacts to reduce overall problem complexity, similar to the approach taken in [28]. In this formulation, valid impulses must satisfy an implicit constraint of the form…”
Section: A Model Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Stepping events will be assumed to occur after a fixed period, T , and result in a discrete event with the post-step state given by a reset map x + = r(x − , s, Λ) for the foot location s ∈ [−1, 1] and impact impulse Λ ∈ R. Here, we take r(x − , s, Λ) to be affine in s. Note that some models will follow the traditional LIPM approach and assume zero impulse during stepping, and others will include impulsive impact forces transmitted through a massless leg. While, for models with impacts, it might be possible to explicitly define the impulse Λ, we instead will exploit an implicit definition of inelastic impacts to reduce overall problem complexity, similar to the approach taken in [28]. In this formulation, valid impulses must satisfy an implicit constraint of the form…”
Section: A Model Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [27] and [18] for an overview of SOS programming. Recent applications have included verification and control design of robotic systems, [22,34], hybrid systems [25], and of mechanical systems undergoing contact [28].…”
Section: Barrier Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The stability analysis of continuous-time hybrid systems with SOS certificates was investigated in [PP09]. [PTT16] have recently applied analogous techniques to perform stability analysis and controller synthesis in the context of robotics. Other studies rely on SOS reinforcement and moment relaxations to obtain hierarchies of approximations converging to sets of interest such as the DoA in continuous-time, either from outside in [HK14] or from inside in [KHJ12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%