1970
DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19700530736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilité des carboxylates de terres, III. Maléates, méthylsuccinates et malates

Abstract: The stability constants of maleates, methylsuccinates and malates of rare earths have been determined at 25.0 °C and at ionic strength 0,100 (NaClO4) by a potentiometric method. Each ligand forms 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 complexes in aqueous solution, the malates being the most stable. The first and the second dissociation constants of the ligand acids were also measured. The 1 : 2 maleates of La, Pr, Nd, Sm, and Eu have been isolated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binuclear complexes with various stoichiometry to a considerable amounts are not detected by us. Calculated stability constants of L-malate complexes are satisfactorily agreed with data [3,5,6,8,[9][10][11][12][13]. In works [10][11] calculated stability constants of monomalate complexes were probably overestimated because of the neglect of protonated complexes.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Binuclear complexes with various stoichiometry to a considerable amounts are not detected by us. Calculated stability constants of L-malate complexes are satisfactorily agreed with data [3,5,6,8,[9][10][11][12][13]. In works [10][11] calculated stability constants of monomalate complexes were probably overestimated because of the neglect of protonated complexes.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 67%
“…In works [10][11] calculated stability constants of monomalate complexes were probably overestimated because of the neglect of protonated complexes. And it is possible to explain the understated stability constants of dimalate complexes [3,5,6,8,9,12,13] by use both of the uncoordinated scheme of equilibrium and the neglect of protonated complexes and hydroxocomplexes. ion.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We feel that the different results obtained in the two buffer systems is a reflection of the difference in metal ion binding capacities of the two buffers. Hepes has a very low affinity for metal ions (Good et al, 1966) whereas a dicarboxylic acid such as maleate would be expected to have a higher affinity for the metal ions (A) for the Nd3" complex is 4610, Roulet et al (1970)). In maleate buffer there is less free metal ion present and hence the effective metal ion concentration is much lower than in Hepes buffer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%