2014
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2014.939697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilising a clay using tyre buffings and lime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction in the compaction characteristics as a result of GR inclusion can be attributed to the lower specific gravity and hydrophobic nature of the rubber particles compared with the soil grains (Cabalar et al, 2014;Özkul and Baykal, 2007;Signes et al, 2016). Similarly to the consistency limits, the optimum water content is primarily a function of the soil's clay/fines content, with higher clay contents exhibiting a higher optimum water content.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reduction in the compaction characteristics as a result of GR inclusion can be attributed to the lower specific gravity and hydrophobic nature of the rubber particles compared with the soil grains (Cabalar et al, 2014;Özkul and Baykal, 2007;Signes et al, 2016). Similarly to the consistency limits, the optimum water content is primarily a function of the soil's clay/fines content, with higher clay contents exhibiting a higher optimum water content.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…swell-shrink capacity), which can facilitate the production and placement of sustainable earth fills such as road and railway embankments (e.g. Cabalar et al, 2014;Cetin et al, 2006;Özkul and Baykal, 2007;Perez et al, 2017;Signes et al, 2016;Soltani et al, 2018bSoltani et al, , 2018cSrivastava et al, 2014;Trouzine et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2018;Tiwari, 2017a, 2017b). When placed in a flowable condition, the rubber-soil blend outperforms conventional soil backfills by enabling the placement of particles into any irregular or inaccessible space without significant compaction efforts (ACI R229 (ACI, 2013)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virgin soil resulted in γdmax = 15.07 kN/m 3 (wopt = 26.00%), whereas the inclusion of 10% RA and RB resulted in γdmax = 14.35 kN/m 3 and 14.37 kN/m 3 (wopt = 23.87% and 23.46%), respectively. Such trends can be attributed to the lower specific gravity, specific surface area, and water adsorption capacity (or hydrophobic nature) of the rubber particles compared with the soil grains [32,34].…”
Section: Compaction Studies and Sample Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virgin soil resulted in γ dmax = 15.07 kN/m 3 (w opt = 26.00%), whereas the inclusion of 10% RA and RB resulted in γ dmax = 14.35 kN/m 3 and 14.37 kN/m 3 (w opt = 23.87% and 23.46%), respectively. Such trends can be attributed to the lower specific gravity, specific surface area, and water adsorption capacity (or hydrophobic nature) of the rubber particles compared with the soil grains [32,34]. Samples for the cyclic wetting-drying tests were prepared at their respective dry of optimum condition, defined as 5% less than the optimum water content and its corresponding dry unit weight-point "O" for C, point "A" for CRA, and point "B" for CRB, as outlined in Figure 2.…”
Section: Compaction Studies and Sample Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of waste materials for soil reinforcement has been gaining popularity primarily because of its versatility, easy and cost-effective construction. For example, different forms of waste tires have been employed in some applications in civil engineering including insulation beneath roads, slope stability, and lightweight backfill retaining walls (Mitchell and Katti, 1981;Fatani, Bauer and Al-Joulani, 1991;Ahmed and Lovell, 1992;Edil and Bosscher, 1994;Masad et al 1996;Shahu, Yudhbir, and Kameswara,1999;Kim and Santamarina, 2008;Tanchaisawat, Bergado, Voottipruex and Shehzad, 2010;Sarkar, Abbas, and Shahu, 2012;Edincliler, Cabalar, Cevik and Cagatay, 2012;Cabalar, Karabash and Mustafa, 2014;Cabalar and Karabash, 2015;Gomes Correira, Winter and Puppala, 2016;Patel and Shahu, 2016;Seddon, Winter and Nettleton, 2018;Cabalar, Zardikawi and Abdulnafaa, 2019). In addition, investigations on plastic waste use as soil reinforcement material have proved its worth in geotechnical applications including road bases, embankments, slope stability, retaining walls by increases in shear strength, and reductions of post peak losses in soils (Maher and Ho 1994;Santoni et al 2001;Zornberg 2002;Consoli, Prietto and Ulbrich, 2007;Muntohar, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%