2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41640-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilised Finite Element Methods for Ill-Posed Problems with Conditional Stability

Abstract: In this paper we discuss the adjoint stabilised finite element method introduced in E. Burman, Stabilized finite element methods for nonsymmetric, noncoercive and ill-posed problems. Part I: elliptic equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing [10] and how it may be used for the computation of solutions to problems for which the standard stability theory given by the Lax-Milgram Lemma or the Babuska-Brezzi Theorem fails. We pay particular attention to ill-posed problems that have some conditional stability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a detailed presentation of such discrete stabilizing operators we refer the reader to [5] or [7]. We define on V h and W h , respectively, the norms…”
Section: Stabilized Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a detailed presentation of such discrete stabilizing operators we refer the reader to [5] or [7]. We define on V h and W h , respectively, the norms…”
Section: Stabilized Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When deriving error estimates for the stabilized FEM that we herein introduce, we shall make use of the mild condition kh 1. To keep down the technical detail we restrict the analysis to the case of piecewise affine finite element spaces, but the extension of the proposed method to the high order case follows using the stabilization operators suggested in [5] (see also [7] for a discussion of the analysis in the ill-posed case).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of the estimate depends on the Hölder coefficient of the continuous stability estimate which depends on the size of the measure domain and the distance between the target domain and the boundary of the computational domain. For simplicity, we restrict the discussion to piecewise affine continuous approximation spaces, but the arguments can be extended to higher order finite element spaces, with the expected improvement of convergence order, following the ideas of [20]. It should however be noted that the system matrix becomes increasingly ill-posed as the polynomial order increases and the computation becomes more sensitive to noise in the measured data, so the practical interest in using high order approximation spaces remains to be proven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein we will advocate a different approach based on discretization of the ill-posed physical model in an optimization framework, followed by regularization of the discrete problem. This primal-dual approach was first introduced by Burman in the papers [11,13,12,14], drawing on previous work by Bourgeois and Dardé on quasi reversibility methods [4,5,7,8] and further developed for elliptic data assimilation problems [17], for parabolic data reconstruction problems in [20,18] and finally for unique continuation for Helmholtz equation [19]. For a related method using finite element spaces with C 1 -regularity see [22] and for methods designed for well-posed, but indefinite problems, we refer to [9] and for second order elliptic problems on non-divergence form see [38] and [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%