2018
DOI: 10.4103/ajns.ajns_29_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stab wounds to the head; Case series, review of literature, and proposed management algorithm

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Stabbing the head is a rare event. It may occur following an assault or self-inflicted injury. We intend to report our experience with four such cases and review narratively the relevant literature. A treatment algorithm will be delivered. Materials and Methods: We have reviewed four of our cases; three were stabbed to the orbit and one to the head. Results: Enucleation was performed in one case. Vision could be preserved in the other two and brain abscess developed in the other case… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These models have been praised for their easy standardization and reproducibility of results, which could correlate to TBI outcomes in patients. However, SWIs account for a minor portion of TBIs in patients 23 , and similar to the CCI and FPI models, the SWI model relies on a complex surgical procedure—a craniotomy—which alone can cause intracerebral bleeding, edema formation, inflammation, and worsening of neurological scores 24 . Furthermore, in the cases of CCI and FPI, the direct impact on the brain causes extensive tissue loss and limits the predictive validity of the models 7 , 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have been praised for their easy standardization and reproducibility of results, which could correlate to TBI outcomes in patients. However, SWIs account for a minor portion of TBIs in patients 23 , and similar to the CCI and FPI models, the SWI model relies on a complex surgical procedure—a craniotomy—which alone can cause intracerebral bleeding, edema formation, inflammation, and worsening of neurological scores 24 . Furthermore, in the cases of CCI and FPI, the direct impact on the brain causes extensive tissue loss and limits the predictive validity of the models 7 , 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A screwdriver may be favored more in countries such as Greece where the possession of a concealed knife is illegal, but not a screwdriver [ 4 ]. Such non-projectile penetrating cerebral trauma is rare accounting for only about 0.4% of all head injuries [ 5 , 6 ] and has involved a variety of objects including crochet hooks, a toilet brush handle, an antler, scissors, knitting needles, crossbow bolts, glass, car antennas, crowbars, pitchforks, a chair leg, and umbrella ribs [ 4 , 7 10 ]. In attacks with screw drivers, the skull is usually penetrated in areas such as the orbital plates (as in the reported case) and the nasal or squamous temporal bones where the bone is thin [ 4 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infection rate for patients with construction siteassociated injuries was higher than that for patients with bullet injuries 6 but similar to that for patients with nonbullet injuries. 3 Based on the recommendations in the literature, the antibiotic use should be longer than 1 week, and the antibiotic spectrum should cover gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria in such patients 7 ; however, this recommendation is still controversial. 8 All patients in this study were cured after receiving anti-infection treatment with vancomycin combined with meropenem, and no postoperative brain abscess occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early decompressive craniotomy can reduce the influence of intracranial hypertension on outcome and promote recovery. Small-incision surgery has also been used for these types of patients in foreign studies 3,14 ; its advantages and disadvantages require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation