2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10904-014-0031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SrFe12O19/Zn0.65Ni0.25Cu0.1Fe2O4 Core–Shell Nanocomposite: Synthesis, Chracterization and Catalytic Activity in Aqueous Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(d)], suggesting two‐phase behavior. The magnetic properties of the raw mixture are in accordance with previously published results about mixtures of hard/soft magnetic materials without an exchange interaction between the hard and soft phase . Namely, this kink also indicates that the magnetization reversal does not occur under the same strength of an applied field for both materials (the materials are not exchange coupled) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(d)], suggesting two‐phase behavior. The magnetic properties of the raw mixture are in accordance with previously published results about mixtures of hard/soft magnetic materials without an exchange interaction between the hard and soft phase . Namely, this kink also indicates that the magnetization reversal does not occur under the same strength of an applied field for both materials (the materials are not exchange coupled) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The magnetic properties of the raw mixture are in accordance with previously published results about mixtures of hard/soft magnetic materials without an exchange interaction between the hard and soft phase . Namely, this kink also indicates that the magnetization reversal does not occur under the same strength of an applied field for both materials (the materials are not exchange coupled) . On the contrary, the magnetic properties of the C6 composite suggest single‐phase behavior typical for efficiently exchange‐coupled hard–soft magnetic composites .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…8), is consistent with the above simple theoretical arguments. In some cases, two-stage loops, typical of spring-magnets, have also been observed [93][94][95]98,114,115,131,190,242,245,261,263,264,266,268,269,271,278,279,[282][283][284][285]289,294,295] (see Fig. 9).…”
Section: Static Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To achieve high performances, PMs ideally require a squared magnetization loop to keep as much of the magnetization as possible within the magnet: specifically, a strong saturation magnetization ( M S ) together with a high remanent magnetization ( M R ) combined with a high coercivity ( H C ) (i.e., high resistance to demagnetization). , Despite considerable efforts, usually all these values cannot be maximized simultaneously in the same material. Hence, coupling materials with intrinsically different physical properties could result in nanocomposites prototypical of a new category of magnets. , For these reasons, several studies on ferrite-based NCs can be found in the literature, covering composites prepared as powders by physical mixing of the two phases, or by different chemical one-pot synthesis, , as multilayers films , and as dense ceramic pellets by spark plasma sinterer, or warm compaction . Nevertheless, the lack of comprehensive studies on the degree of magnetic coupling in such systems is rather broad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%