The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2020.3037225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SRARNet: A Unified Framework for Joint Superresolution and Aircraft Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that the effect of a good training schedule was much greater than changing models (as long as model size was similar). Our ResNet-50 performed very similarly to our Swin-models, and greatly outperformed Wu's [7] ResNet-50 from the original MTARSI paper, as well as all models by previous authors [9] [10] [8] [11] on the MTARSI dataset. We attribute the performance of our models to: 1) having chosen a good training regiment, 2) using pretrained ImageNet weights and normalizing our dataset to ImageNet's mean and standard deviation (many previous authors have used pre-trained weights but have not performed the additional normalization step).…”
Section: B Results and Problems With Mtarsi Dataset Generalizabilitysupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results showed that the effect of a good training schedule was much greater than changing models (as long as model size was similar). Our ResNet-50 performed very similarly to our Swin-models, and greatly outperformed Wu's [7] ResNet-50 from the original MTARSI paper, as well as all models by previous authors [9] [10] [8] [11] on the MTARSI dataset. We attribute the performance of our models to: 1) having chosen a good training regiment, 2) using pretrained ImageNet weights and normalizing our dataset to ImageNet's mean and standard deviation (many previous authors have used pre-trained weights but have not performed the additional normalization step).…”
Section: B Results and Problems With Mtarsi Dataset Generalizabilitysupporting
confidence: 53%
“…These images were then labelled into distinct aircraft models/classes for classification. Recent research (within past 2 years) have achieved good results on the dataset using a variety of classical models, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), and mixed classical/deep learning methods [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]. The results of Azam and al.…”
Section: ) Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proper detection of tiny blurring airplanes in complicated airport photos is achieved by using an efficient deep belief network (DBN) [ 23 ] to rebuild high-resolution features from numerous input images, including grayscale images and two locally thresholded images. By creating high-resolution aircraft from low-resolution remote sensing images, Tang et al [ 24 ] proposed a joint super-resolution and aircraft recognition (Joint-SRARNet) SRARNet to enhance aircraft recognition performance. However, there is still a lack of study on the topic of aircraft pose estimation at low resolution, requiring further research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with fully supervised object detection (FSOD) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], the major advantage of weakly supervised object detection (WSOD) is that only image-level category annotations are necessary for training the WSOD model. Considering the low cost of data labeling, WSOD has been widely researched in recent years [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and has been applied in scene classification [18,19], disaster detection [20,21], military [22,23], and other applications [24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%