1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3697(98)00146-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Sr1−Ca )3Ru2O7 system: optical and ARPES results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that this propagating spin mode changes the onset frequency for single particle scattering, gives rise to the "peak-dip-hump" features in the quasiparticle spectral function, the "dippeak" features in tunneling SIS and SIN conductances, and to singularities and fine structures in the optical conductivity. In section 6, we apply these results to cuprate superconductors and argue that (i) these features have been observed 147 158,160 are consistent with each other, and (iii) the value of ∆ s extracted from these various experiments coincides with the resonance frequency measured directly in neutron scattering experiments [161][162][163] .…”
Section: Fingerprints Of Spin Fermion Pairingsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show that this propagating spin mode changes the onset frequency for single particle scattering, gives rise to the "peak-dip-hump" features in the quasiparticle spectral function, the "dippeak" features in tunneling SIS and SIN conductances, and to singularities and fine structures in the optical conductivity. In section 6, we apply these results to cuprate superconductors and argue that (i) these features have been observed 147 158,160 are consistent with each other, and (iii) the value of ∆ s extracted from these various experiments coincides with the resonance frequency measured directly in neutron scattering experiments [161][162][163] .…”
Section: Fingerprints Of Spin Fermion Pairingsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This adjustment yields ω pl ∼ 20000cm −1 . This value is somewhat larger than ω pl ∼ 16000cm obtained experimentally by integrating σ 1 up to about 2 − 2.5eV 158,190,191 , however it agrees with the theoretical result 109 that the sum rule for σ 1 (ω) is exhausted only at extremely high frequencies of about 50ω, that are much larger than 2eV. We see that theoretical calculations of σ 1 (ω) and σ 2 (ω) capture the essential features of the measured forms of the conductivities.…”
Section: The Optical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In Fig. 1͑b͒ we compare our results for 1 () ͑ignoring the contributions from the nodes͒ directly with the experimental data by Puchkov et al 19 for optimally doped YBa 2 Cu 3 O 6ϩ␦ . We used p ϭ1.6ϫ10 4 cm Ϫ1 , similar to that in Ref.…”
Section: Rapid Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…46 Consequently, the current-imbalance factor is reduced to 10) where ± corresponds to forward/2k F scattering. The combination of the four Z factors form a scaling function of δk, δp, and δq.…”
Section: √ωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed in the cuprates. 10 The scale Ω min ∼ḡ 2 /E F is parametrically smaller than the scale of the superconducting T c ∼ḡ, hence 1/Ω 1/3 behavior is likely to be masked by superconductivity (or finite T > T c ).…”
Section: /3mentioning
confidence: 99%