2012
DOI: 10.3390/rs4041069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SR-4000 and CamCube3.0 Time of Flight (ToF) Cameras: Tests and Comparison

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper experimental comparisons between two Time-of-Flight (ToF) cameras are reported in order to test their performance and to give some procedures for testing data delivered by this kind of technology. In particular, the SR-4000 camera by Mesa Imaging AG and the CamCube3.0 by PMD Technologies have been evaluated since they have good performances and are well known to researchers dealing with Time-ofFlight (ToF) cameras. After a brief overview of commercial ToF cameras available on the market … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However compared to other depth sensors, ToF cameras cannot be considered yet as a mature sensor. The disadvantages are obvious such as low resolution, motion artifacts, edge distortion, ambient light noise, et al, [1,5]. Despite its disadvantages, it is already showing great potential in many applications where fast 3D depth data is needed, such as pose estimation [6,7], obstacle avoidance [8,9] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However compared to other depth sensors, ToF cameras cannot be considered yet as a mature sensor. The disadvantages are obvious such as low resolution, motion artifacts, edge distortion, ambient light noise, et al, [1,5]. Despite its disadvantages, it is already showing great potential in many applications where fast 3D depth data is needed, such as pose estimation [6,7], obstacle avoidance [8,9] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments used the Swiss Ranger ToF cameras. Even though both cameras use the same principle to measure distance, their sensors tend to have different characteristics, based on the number and arrangement of the modulated NIR light sources [8]. The accuracy of these sensors is limited by errors that are caused by the measurement principle, the architecture of the sensors, and the environment (background light and reflectivity of objects).…”
Section: Tof Camera Ego-motion Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the fourth-generation ToF camera from Swiss Ranger, and most of the systematic errors -such as internal scattering, which was an issue in the third-generation cameras -have been eliminated [13]. The SR4000 does not have temperature compensation, so a 40-minute warm-up time is allowed before any experiments are performed, as suggested in [8]. The non-systematic errors, which are mostly dependent on the scene configuration, are handled by the various filters discussed below.…”
Section: D Tof Pre-processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the same study carried out a few millimetre differences between the distances measured by total station and the camera. The warm-up time of the camera was investigated on Piatti and Rinaudo (2012). Jamtsho (2010) was investigated accuracy of the ToF camera, and measured the structural deformation with 0.3mm accuracy.…”
Section: Time-of-flight Cameramentioning
confidence: 99%