Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter

Abstract

Twitter is rapidly gaining attention from strategic communicators for its ability to enhance communication campaigns. Whether using the site to augment word-of-mouth marketing campaigns or engage in conversations with stakeholders, Twitter has become the leading online social media outlet for marketing and public relations efforts. However, despite the service's ability to provide a forum for interacting with stakeholders, the site primarily began as a way for its users to provide one-way updates and disseminate information. By using the models of public relations as its framework, this study examines how government agencies are using Twitter to communicate with their audiences through content analysis of 1800 updates from 60 government agencies. Contrary to public affairs practitioners' claims of interactivity on Twitter, government agencies primarily relied on one-way communication that sought to inform and educate rather than two-way symmetrical conversations.

Social media-based sponsorship activation – a typology of content

“…product-or service-related), rather than emotional or experiential, in appeal. Despite the much lauded relational benefits of social media, therefore, there is considerable evidence to suggest that many organisations and brands are posting more informational and one-way communications (Mamic and Alvaraz, 2013;Svensson et al, 2015;Waters and Jamal 2011;Waters and Williams 2011).…”

An analysis of how Fortune 500 companies respond to users replying to company tweets

“…Although many companies have a poor record for engaging with individual social media users (Waters & Williams, 2011), companies should respond to user comments from an interactivity standpoint. According to the classic contingency viewpoint of interactivity, there are three levels of interactivity: non-interactive, reactive, and interactive (Rafaeli, 1988;Sundar, Brwon, & Kalyanaraman, 2003).…”

Complexity and Design for Wellbeing in Community Participation

“…These studies are also based on analysing observed practice and interviews. The Walters and Williams [8] research analysed actual tweets to establish if the information was mainly one or two way communication. Their results showed the majority of information was only one way as government tends to redirect questions to other sites showing a lack of communication.…”