2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Squatting and kicking model evaluation for prioritized sliced resource management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, few works, in literature focus on the link resources management (e.g., bandwidth management) considering a multi-slice scenario with prioritized demands despite its necessity for the realization of future network services characterized by massive bandwidth requirements [20], [21], [22]. Regarding bandwidth resource management under a multislice scenario, SKM exhibits competitiveness compared to Bandwidth Allocation Models (BAMs) and best-effort algorithms, especially during congested scenarios [23]. We, therefore, consider the SKM algorithm for this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Currently, few works, in literature focus on the link resources management (e.g., bandwidth management) considering a multi-slice scenario with prioritized demands despite its necessity for the realization of future network services characterized by massive bandwidth requirements [20], [21], [22]. Regarding bandwidth resource management under a multislice scenario, SKM exhibits competitiveness compared to Bandwidth Allocation Models (BAMs) and best-effort algorithms, especially during congested scenarios [23]. We, therefore, consider the SKM algorithm for this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the authors are exploiting the results from their previous work in El-mekkawi et al [23] in the following aspects:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations