2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03703-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SQMtools: automated processing and visual analysis of ’omics data with R and anvi’o

Abstract: Background: The dramatic decrease in sequencing costs over the last decade has boosted the adoption of high-throughput sequencing applications as a standard tool for the analysis of environmental microbial communities. Nowadays even small research groups can easily obtain raw sequencing data. After that, however, nonspecialists are faced with the double challenge of choosing among an everincreasing array of analysis methodologies, and navigating the vast amounts of results returned by these approaches. Results… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediction of ORF resulted in 3.24–6.04 million of CDS per sample and between 29.73% and 37.85% of CDS per sample were assigned to KEGG Orthology (KO) (Supp Data 2 b,c). The data obtained in this way was then loaded into R v. 4.0.4 85 and, using the SQMtools 86 library (function loadSQM), only data taxonomically assigned to the bacterial group was selected for further analysis (function subsetTax). Tables containing the abundance and TPM (transcript per million) of each KEGG Orthologs (KOs) for each sample were exported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of ORF resulted in 3.24–6.04 million of CDS per sample and between 29.73% and 37.85% of CDS per sample were assigned to KEGG Orthology (KO) (Supp Data 2 b,c). The data obtained in this way was then loaded into R v. 4.0.4 85 and, using the SQMtools 86 library (function loadSQM), only data taxonomically assigned to the bacterial group was selected for further analysis (function subsetTax). Tables containing the abundance and TPM (transcript per million) of each KEGG Orthologs (KOs) for each sample were exported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coverage and abundance estimation for genes and contigs were performed using Bedtools and normalized using the reads per kilobase per million mapped reads (RPKM) method (Quinlan and Hall, 2010 ). The statistical downstream analyses were performed using the SQMtools and phyloseq R packages (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013 ; Puente-Sánchez et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the cleaned reads were analysed using the SqueezeMeta pipeline version 1.4.0 with the default parameters and the coassembly option [24] . The package SQMtools [25] was used to integrate SqueezeMeta data in R and for the functional analysis. Taxonomic and functional values were converted to relative abundances to compare results between samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%