2018
DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2018.1532170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SQEezing the jurisprudence out of the SRA’s super exam: the SQE’s Bleak Legal Realism and the rejection of law’s multimodal truth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the proposed introduction by the SRA of the SQE-designed to radically reform access the profession for potential lawyers-primarily consists of extended and quantifiable multiple choice tests that can be centrally administered, and, more importantly, rest upon a binary conception of the correctness or accuracy of legal statements and applications. The scholarly quality is squeezed (dare I say, "SQEezed" 128 ) out of law. As Mason narrates, "behind both the aggressive posturing and nuanced development of different schools of legal theory … lies a debate about how one correctly identifies the content of the law".…”
Section: The Awful Acronymisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the proposed introduction by the SRA of the SQE-designed to radically reform access the profession for potential lawyers-primarily consists of extended and quantifiable multiple choice tests that can be centrally administered, and, more importantly, rest upon a binary conception of the correctness or accuracy of legal statements and applications. The scholarly quality is squeezed (dare I say, "SQEezed" 128 ) out of law. As Mason narrates, "behind both the aggressive posturing and nuanced development of different schools of legal theory … lies a debate about how one correctly identifies the content of the law".…”
Section: The Awful Acronymisationmentioning
confidence: 99%