2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.12.035
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spumaretroviruses: Updated taxonomy and nomenclature

Abstract: Spumaretroviruses, commonly referred to as foamy viruses, are complex retroviruses belonging to the subfamily Spumaretrovirinae, family Retroviridae, which naturally infect a variety of animals including nonhuman primates (NHPs). Additionally, cross-species transmissions of simian foamy viruses (SFVs) to humans have occurred following exposure to tissues of infected NHPs. Recent research has led to the identification of previously unknown exogenous foamy viruses, and to the discovery of endogenous spumaretrovi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain name was added for unique sequences (e.g., ggo_huBAK82). Abbreviations are as reported in a recent taxonomy and nomenclature report (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain name was added for unique sequences (e.g., ggo_huBAK82). Abbreviations are as reported in a recent taxonomy and nomenclature report (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foamy viruses (FVs), also known as spumaviruses, are the least known subfamily of Retroviridae [1]. Some features of their replication pathway and complex genomic organization distinguish them from other retroviruses [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family of Retroviridae is divided into two subfamilies: The Spumaretrovirinae consist of five genera of different spuma or foamy viruses with shared and unique features that separate them from the canonical Orthoretrovirinae, which comprise all other known exogenous retroviruses ( Figure 1) [1]. The number of research groups working on FVs is correspondingly small and even further split by their individual research focus or the FV isolate or host species used in their studies but also due to the sheer difference in numbers and an apparent lack of pathogenicity of foamy viruses (FV).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%