2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003117445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPSS Survival Manual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
620
0
75

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 611 publications
(710 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
620
0
75
Order By: Relevance
“…Multicollinearity of the variables was checked using variance inflation factor (VIF) and tolerance. The tolerance values of all the variables were greater than 0.1 and the VIF values were less than 10, reflecting the model meets the assumption of multicollinearity (Pallant, 2013); in other words, the predictor variables are not strongly related to each other. All analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 (Version 19, IBM SPSS, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Multicollinearity of the variables was checked using variance inflation factor (VIF) and tolerance. The tolerance values of all the variables were greater than 0.1 and the VIF values were less than 10, reflecting the model meets the assumption of multicollinearity (Pallant, 2013); in other words, the predictor variables are not strongly related to each other. All analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 (Version 19, IBM SPSS, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A first limitation of this study is that for the principal component analysis the sample size might be too small. A larger number of participants than in this study is normally recommended (Pallant, 2010). The small number of participants could have played a part in not finding clear latent structures among our variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare proportions, we used chi-square tests, and to compare differences in duration, frequency, and duration per episode, we used non-parametric Mann–Whitney U tests, because assumptions regarding normality and equal variance were violated. Corresponding effect size r was calculated using the formula of Pallant (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on all continuous variables were screened to ensure they met the assumptions of the analyses (Pallant, 2010). Although several outliers were identified, they were retained in the analyses as (a) they were within the range of possible scores for their respective variables and (b) their scores were theoretically or longitudinally consistent (e.g., participants reported extremely low body esteem on several occasions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%