Proceedings of the 12th Reinventing Space Conference 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-34024-1_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sprite, a Very Low-Cost Launch Vehicle for Small Satellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thrust was assumed to be produced in the axial direction only without consideration of thrust vector control as described in Equation (9).…”
Section: Figure 1 Thrusts and Body Diameters Mainly Of Single-stage S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thrust was assumed to be produced in the axial direction only without consideration of thrust vector control as described in Equation (9).…”
Section: Figure 1 Thrusts and Body Diameters Mainly Of Single-stage S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reaching a certain altitude is crucial to a sounding rocket's operations, which provides test environments with micro gravity, low air density, and sufficient descending velocity with an adequate flight time, the final altitude is one of the most critical parameters of such a rocket's performance and is among the principal design objectives. Not only from this perspective, but also concerning operational efficiency, in light of a new aspect of cost-sensitive space technology emerging recently represented by such as low-cost and reusable launch vehicles [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], there is a greater need today for the maximisation of final altitudes and the minimisation of propellant masses of vertically launched flight vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst still hindered by the same depth issues (<5 m) radiometric issues that influence traditional satellites, with increased temporal frequency (daily) they provide greater opportunity for cloud-free, non-turbid, low, or high tidal, reduced wave conditions to be captured for greater coverage of coral reefs (Hedley et al, 2018;Joyce et al, 2018), increasing the spatial scale and resolution of ecological assessment from these satellites (Figure 3). Whilst currently limited by sensors and spectral bands (e.g., Red, Green, Blue, Infrared are standard output of rapid-return nanosatellites), the cost to produce (Kenyon and Stanton, 2017;Sarzi-Amade et al, 2017) these satellites is far less than traditional satellites.…”
Section: Spatial Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%