2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spring temperatures alter reproductive development in grapevines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…!! !# effect is consistent with earlier research that found that warm conditions during the initial shoot development and flower formation period in spring promoted yield formation in grapevines by increasing leaf area, flower size, and fruit set (Keller et al, 2010). It seems plausible that the inverse correlation between yield and early-season rainfall might be related to the general association of rain with low solar irradiance (i. e., cool temperatures and low light intensity).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…!! !# effect is consistent with earlier research that found that warm conditions during the initial shoot development and flower formation period in spring promoted yield formation in grapevines by increasing leaf area, flower size, and fruit set (Keller et al, 2010). It seems plausible that the inverse correlation between yield and early-season rainfall might be related to the general association of rain with low solar irradiance (i. e., cool temperatures and low light intensity).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, while the water deficit was not severe enough to reduce fruit set, it may have been sufficient to limit flower size and hence berry size (cf. Keller et al 2010). Rootstock effects on yield formation varied by scion cultivar, but 3309C and 5C were often associated with high yields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flowers per cluster and percent fruit set were estimated by counting abscised flower caps collected in gauze bags (1 mm perforations) and counting the berries of the same clusters (Keller et al 2010). Average flower size for each cluster was estimated by drying (60°C) and weighing the collected flower caps, assuming that cap weight is proportional to flower weight and, hence, size (Keller et al 2010). Yield, clusters per vine, and mean berry weight were determined at harvest and used to estimate clusters per shoot and berries per cluster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong positive correlation (r = 0.90) between yield per vine and the number of clusters per plant (Table 2), together with the lack of significance with cluster weight and very poor (r = 0.35) with berry weight, suggest that the number of clusters per vine was the key component in determining the final grape production per plant, at the expense of average berry and cluster weight. This is an interesting outcome, as the number of clusters per vine is directly impacted by bud fertility, which is determined at the flowering period in the previous season [60] (May-June 2010). The weather conditions in Spring 2010 at the vineyard of study (data from Navarra Government's meteorological station of Estella) were characterised by intense rainfall (94.9% of average historical rainfall in these two months), low radiation, and cooler temperatures than mean historical values for this area (−1.9 °C in May and −0.6 °C in June), as shown above.…”
Section: Correlation Analysis Between Spectral Indices Field Variablmentioning
confidence: 99%