2001
DOI: 10.1080/10402000108982422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spring-Supported Thrust Bearings Used in Hydroelectric Generators: Comparison of Experimental Data with Numerical Predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yuan et al. 26 also mentioned that one advantage of this distributed spring support, especially with the larger size of bearing in this application, is the ability to control the deflections of the pad. Compared with the centrally supported tilting pad bearing, the bearing pad temperature can be significantly reduced, and the bearing capacity of the bearing is significantly increased. The support switch structure at the bottom end of the tile converts the centrally supported thrust bearing into a bi-directional offset supported thrust bearing, ensuring optimum offset in both directions. For the central support bearing and offset support bearing under both clockwise and counterclockwise conditions, their oil film thickness, oil film pressure, pad surface temperature, and motor energy input were tested in the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yuan et al. 26 also mentioned that one advantage of this distributed spring support, especially with the larger size of bearing in this application, is the ability to control the deflections of the pad. Compared with the centrally supported tilting pad bearing, the bearing pad temperature can be significantly reduced, and the bearing capacity of the bearing is significantly increased. The support switch structure at the bottom end of the tile converts the centrally supported thrust bearing into a bi-directional offset supported thrust bearing, ensuring optimum offset in both directions. For the central support bearing and offset support bearing under both clockwise and counterclockwise conditions, their oil film thickness, oil film pressure, pad surface temperature, and motor energy input were tested in the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to different requirements of bearing capacity and rotation direction, the offset position and the inclination angle of the tile can be accurately adjusted. Yuan et al 26 also mentioned that one advantage of this distributed spring support, especially with the larger size of bearing in this application, is the ability to control the deflections of the pad. Compared with the centrally supported tilting pad bearing, the bearing pad temperature can be significantly reduced, and the bearing capacity of the bearing is significantly increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of temperature gradient on the behavior of tilting-pad bearings and the tilting angle as a function of speed subjected to hybrid lubrication has been reported by literature. 8 A comparison has been made by Yuan et al 9 between the experimental data and numerical predictions for a large springsupported thrust bearing with centrally placed ringshaped injection pockets and the numerical predictions were based on a model developed by Ettles. 10 A special design and arrangement have been introduced by some of the researchers just to improve the lubrication performance; nonetheless, the problems related to the thrust element thermo-elastic deformation, load-carrying capacity, transient responses are still persisting and continuously reported in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy of these codes is not clear, as there are few papers comparing theoretical and experimental results for large bearings. These examples are the results of the testing of a large bearing in a special unique test rig reported by Yuan et al [11]. Other published results of comparisons between calculations and field data were presented by Dąbrowski and Wasilczuk [12], where the object was a hydrogenerator bearing with a system of compensation of thermal deflections; by Wodtke et al [13], where the results of one of the largest thrust bearings in the world, installed in the Itaipu power plant were presented, and the method utilized was FSI (fluid structure interaction) combining a CFD (computational fluid dynamics) solution for a fluid film with a FEM (finite element method) solution for a solid structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%