2020
DOI: 10.5194/tc-14-4675-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spring melt pond fraction in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago predicted from RADARSAT-2

Abstract: Abstract. Melt ponds form on the surface of Arctic sea ice during spring, influencing how much solar radiation is absorbed into the sea ice–ocean system, which in turn impacts the ablation of sea ice during the melt season. Accordingly, melt pond fraction (fp) has been shown to be a useful predictor of sea ice area during the summer months. Sea ice dynamic and thermodynamic processes operating within the narrow channels and inlets of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) during the summer months are difficult … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decrease in the surface albedo can lead to more absorption of solar radiation, which can further amplify the climate change in the Arctic via the sea-ice feedback mechanism [18]. It has also been reported that the MPF is considered to be a good predictor for the Arctic sea ice extent in September and can be used to improve forecasts of seasonal sea ice changes and climate models [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decrease in the surface albedo can lead to more absorption of solar radiation, which can further amplify the climate change in the Arctic via the sea-ice feedback mechanism [18]. It has also been reported that the MPF is considered to be a good predictor for the Arctic sea ice extent in September and can be used to improve forecasts of seasonal sea ice changes and climate models [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polashenski et al, 2012). More recently it has been used to improve forecasts of seasonal ice changes and has been reported to be a good predictor for the Arctic sea ice extent in September (Flocco et al, 2012;Schröder et al, 2014;Howell et al, 2020;Ding et al, 2020a;Feng et al, 2021), which underscores the importance of monitoring the evolution of MPF over the Arctic sea ice. Melt pond fraction is defined as the ponded area relative to the sea ice, or in other words, fraction of sea ice covered by melt ponds (Webster et al, 2015;Perovich et al, 2002), and can be estimated following equation:…”
Section: Melt Pond Fraction (Mpf) Satellite-based Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although MPF optical-based retrieval outnumbers radar-based MPF retrievals, few MPF retrievals have been developed as well for radar sensors, such as SAR (e.g. Fors et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Scharien et al, 2017;Howell et al, 2020) followed 615 by passive microwave data (e.g. Tanaka et al, 2016;Tanaka and Scharien, 2022) (Table 1).…”
Section: Radar Data Traditional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The available SAR MPF retrievals (Scharien et al, 2017;Han et al, 2016;Fors et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Ramjan et al, 2018;Howell et al, 2020), in addition to limitations on the spatial coverage, are also affected by the inability to distinguish melt ponds and open water due to their equally low backscatter signal. In general case, an unknown sea ice surface roughness has to be resolved from an unknown water/melt pond surface roughness, and the angular backscatter dependency delivers additional challenges in terms of signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%