2013
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spreading dynamics on spatially constrained complex brain networks

Abstract: The study of dynamical systems defined on complex networks provides a natural framework with which to investigate myriad features of neural dynamics and has been widely undertaken. Typically, however, networks employed in theoretical studies bear little relation to the spatial embedding or connectivity of the neural networks that they attempt to replicate. Here, we employ detailed neuroimaging data to define a network whose spatial embedding represents accurately the folded structure of the cortical surface of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We simulated network spreading dynamics using a family of linear threshold models (LTMs) that describe how local perturbations trigger global cascades (Granovetter, 1978;O'Dea et al, 2013). The models simulate how multiple exposures to some perturbation from the neighborhood of a node cause the node itself to adopt an active state (Watts, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We simulated network spreading dynamics using a family of linear threshold models (LTMs) that describe how local perturbations trigger global cascades (Granovetter, 1978;O'Dea et al, 2013). The models simulate how multiple exposures to some perturbation from the neighborhood of a node cause the node itself to adopt an active state (Watts, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By deliberately abstracting away microscopic details such as neuronal signaling, simple models emphasize the emergence of global patterns from the interactions among individual neural elements and allow us to articulate and quantify the behavior of the system as a whole (Raj et al, 2012;Stam et al, 2015;O'Dea et al, 2013;Mi si c et al, 2014aMi si c et al, , 2014bMessé et al, 2015). This approach is complementary to traditional modeling paradigms in computational neuroscience, which aim to reduce large populations of spiking neurons to a distribution of states across time (Deco et al, 2008;Ritter et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Role Of Simple Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In other words, perfect routing predicts no relationship between search information or path transitivity and the strength of FC. The fact that we observe such a relationship implies that neuronal interactions during spontaneous or resting-brain dynamics are not fully accounted for by perfect routing models and instead suggest diffusion or spreading dynamics (35,38) or "greedy routing" strategies (37) as potential candidate models for brain network communication. Specifically, our results demonstrate that the embedding of shortest paths within the network plays an additional important role, in particular the (weighted) degree sequence of the path and the availability of detours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While characterizing relatively stable architecture, studies have gradually emphasized the importance of the dynamics of functional network architectures 39,25,54 . However, very few studies have satisfied the following criteria: (1) millisecond temporal resolution, (2) treating the whole-brain as one system, (3) inclusion of structural constraints, and (4) exclusion of computational demands of localized electrical activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%