Electrophysiological recording of neuronal unit activity during paired training trials from various regions of the ipsilateral cerebellum in rabbits well trained in the classically conditioned eyelid/nictitating membrane response have revealed both stimulus-evoked responses and responses that form an amplitude/temporal model of the learned behavioral response. Ablation of the ipsilateral, lateral cerebellum completely and permanently abolished the behavioral conditioned response in welltrained animals but had no effect at all on the unconditioned reflex response. In marked contrast, conditioned responses were easily trained in the eye contralateral to the cerebellar lesion. We suggest that at least part of the essential neuronal plasticity that codes the learned response may be localized to the cerebellum.Localization of the memory trace-the circuitry that contains the essential neuronal plasticity coding learning and memory-has proved to be a baffling problem (1, 2). Many regions of the mammalian brain appear to play roles in learning and memory, particularly in relatively complex tasks (3, 4), and certain regions are capable of physiological and anatomical modification as a result ofexperience (5-8). However, it has not yet been possible to localize the memory trace for even very simple forms of associative learning. Evidence is described here indicating that the cerebellum may be the locus ofthe memory trace for a basic form of associative learning.Eyelid [and nictitating membrane (NM)] conditioning is perhaps the most widely used paradigm for the study ofbasic properties of classical or Pavlovian conditioning of striated muscle responses in both humans and animals (9-12). Even in this seemingly simple paradigm, higher regions of the brain appear to play important roles (13-16). However, animals from which the cerebral neocortex or hippocampus has been removed are able to learn the standard delay conditioned response (14, 17) as indeed are animals from which all brain tissue above the level ofthe thalamus or midbrain has been removed (18,19). It would seem that the "primary" memory trace for classical conditioning of the eyelid and NM responses is localized below the level of the thalamus. Recent preliminary observations in our laboratory have implicated the cerebellum (20, 21). We report here the results of experiments indicating that the cerebellum is an essential component of the memory system for this basic form of learning.
METHODSStandard procedures for classical conditioning of the rabbit NM and eyelid response were used (15, 22): an acoustic conditioned stimulus for 350 msec, coterminating with a 100-msec corneal air-puff unconditioned stimulus, an intertrial interval of ""60 sec, and 120 trials per day. Extension of the NM was measured with a micropotentiometer and eyelid closure was also monitored; they behave essentially identically (23) and all effects reported here occur equivalently for both responses.All animals were trained to a criterion of eight conditioned responses in any nine con...