2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.finmar.2009.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spread behavior around board meetings for firms with concentrated insider ownership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are literally many studies on measuring the impact of spread on firms' performances (Amihud & Mendelson, 1989). Mishra et al (2009) in a survey reported that the bid-ask spread changes substantially around the board meeting dates. They also reported that the actual number of transactions by insiders could increase following the board meetings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are literally many studies on measuring the impact of spread on firms' performances (Amihud & Mendelson, 1989). Mishra et al (2009) in a survey reported that the bid-ask spread changes substantially around the board meeting dates. They also reported that the actual number of transactions by insiders could increase following the board meetings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also reported that the actual number of transactions by insiders could increase following the board meetings. Moreover, according to Mishra et al (2009) there seems to be a significant relationship between spread and the number of insider trades surrounding the board meeting dates. Demirovic et al (2015) investigated whether accounting data could be reflected in the market-based measures of credit risk and therefore may have no role in describing variations in the credit spread on corporate bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%