1998
DOI: 10.2514/2.5283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray Structures of Liquid Jets Atomized in Subsonic Crossflows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
65
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
65
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, which is consistent with the great number of experimental studies devoted to jet atomisation in cross flow (Oda et al 1994;Inamura and Nagai 1997;Wu et al 1998). Such studies have been conducted for injectors of smaller size, many of which consider fuel jets and mixing of liquid propellants in the combustion process.…”
Section: Drop Pattern Sizesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…, which is consistent with the great number of experimental studies devoted to jet atomisation in cross flow (Oda et al 1994;Inamura and Nagai 1997;Wu et al 1998). Such studies have been conducted for injectors of smaller size, many of which consider fuel jets and mixing of liquid propellants in the combustion process.…”
Section: Drop Pattern Sizesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For such issue, a lot of empirical correlations have been developed by many researchers to predict the liquid column trajectory, breakup distance , and height , for various flow conditions [9,10]. The main parameter governing the phenomenon is the liquid to gas momentum ratio (3) while the crossflow Weber number, (4), is the parameter that controls the breakup regime […”
Section: Operating Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current model was applied to a simulation of an experiment by Wu et al [4,5], which consisted of a liquid jet injected into a turbulent crossflow of gas at low Mach number. Measurements of mass flux, particle velocity, and particle size were made along the spray centerline 300 nozzle diameters downstream of the injection point.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%