2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray penetration, combustion, and soot formation characteristics of the ECN Spray C and Spray D injectors in multiple combustion facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, erosion is observed to have minimal effect on first and second stage ignition, with only a slight decrease in first stage ignition delay to 0.16 ms ASOI and increase in second stage ignition delay to 0.32 ms ASOI. The insensitivity of ignition delay to changes in the injection profiles across the baseline and eroded orifices is consistent with the findings from Maes et al in their comparison of the single-hole ECN cavitating (Spray C) and non-cavitating (Spray D) injectors, which have similarly sized orifice diameters (179-191 µm) operated under a similar condition (22.8 kg/m 3 , 900 K, 15% O2) to that studied in this work [19]. However, erosion was observed to influence flame lift off length.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, erosion is observed to have minimal effect on first and second stage ignition, with only a slight decrease in first stage ignition delay to 0.16 ms ASOI and increase in second stage ignition delay to 0.32 ms ASOI. The insensitivity of ignition delay to changes in the injection profiles across the baseline and eroded orifices is consistent with the findings from Maes et al in their comparison of the single-hole ECN cavitating (Spray C) and non-cavitating (Spray D) injectors, which have similarly sized orifice diameters (179-191 µm) operated under a similar condition (22.8 kg/m 3 , 900 K, 15% O2) to that studied in this work [19]. However, erosion was observed to influence flame lift off length.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For all orifices, the wider spreading angles in the eroded injector led to shorter lift off lengths. Although this finding is qualitatively consistent with those from Maes et al in comparing the lift off lengths of the Spray C and D injectors [19], the predicted lift off lengths in the eroded A-M3 injector do not directly correlate with the spreading angle. The shorter lift off length for Orifice 1 is likely due to the enhanced mixing field from the narrower spreading angle and higher injection velocities relative to Orifices 2 and 3, as noted in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Both injectors have minimal differences in terms of mass flow and orifice diameter, one of the injectors was manufactured with a straight hole and a sharp orifice inlet to induce cavitation, while the other injector was subjected to hydro-erosive grinding and features a convergent hole. The results of this work, shown by Maes et al [114], highlight that the effect of cavitation has an influence on flame lift-off length and ignition delay.…”
Section: Effect Of Cavitation On Combustion Efficiency For Different Nozzle Geometrysupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For years, lots of efforts have been made to decrease the level of exhaust gas emissions and to enhance the performance of direct injection diesel engines. To achieve this goal, different approaches have been applied such as using alternative fuels )alcoholic, 6,7 biofuels, 8 gaseous 911 ), using fuel additives, 12,13 increasing the direct fuel injection pressure, 14,15 changing the nozzle geometry configuration, 16,17 exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), 18,19 varying injection rate and timing, 2022 pilot-injection, 23,24 post-injection, 25,26 and multiple injection strategies. 27,28 Besides these strategies, various combustion technologies, such as homogenous charge compression ignition, 29 part premixed charge compression ignition, 30 and premixed charge compression ignition, 31 have been proposed and widely investigated to achieve better fuel economy and lower emissions in compression ignition engines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%