2014
DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2014.958476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray Combustion Modeling in Lean Direct Injection Combustors, Part II: Multi-Point LDI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dewanji and Rao. 14,15 conducted LES simulations of both a single and a nine-element LDI combustor at atmospheric pressure for an inlet air temperature of 776 K and equivalence ratios of 0.41 and 0.7. Formation of vortex structures in the gas phase such as the VBB and the PVC were found to be critical to fuel distribution and consequently the location of the flame front in the combustor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dewanji and Rao. 14,15 conducted LES simulations of both a single and a nine-element LDI combustor at atmospheric pressure for an inlet air temperature of 776 K and equivalence ratios of 0.41 and 0.7. Formation of vortex structures in the gas phase such as the VBB and the PVC were found to be critical to fuel distribution and consequently the location of the flame front in the combustor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu reported the simultaneous presence of both premixed, partially-premixed and non-premixed flames in the burner and confirmed the enhancement of spray particle dispersion hinted by Patel and Menon [115] as a consequence of the PVC. Meanwhile, Davoudzadeh et al [123] and Dewanji and Rao [124,125] also investigated the non-reacting and reacting flow in the single-element [36] and multi-point [60] NASA LDI combustors through U-RANS and LES approaches. On the one hand, the mean velocity components exhibited by Davoudzadeh et al [123] showed some discrepancy with experimental data at the entrance of the combustion chamber due to a poor grid refinement (0.86 million cells).…”
Section: Computational Studies On Ldi Burnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the mean velocity components exhibited by Davoudzadeh et al [123] showed some discrepancy with experimental data at the entrance of the combustion chamber due to a poor grid refinement (0.86 million cells). On the other hand, the simulations of Dewanji and Rao [124,125] captured the unsteady turbulent flow structures at the border of the neighbouring swirlers and evaluated the spray velocity and drop size distribution for several spray models. In this way, they showed how the shear layers emerging from adjacent swirlers in the multi-point LDI configuration played a major role in the spray dispersion and mixing when compared to the single-element LDI burner.…”
Section: Computational Studies On Ldi Burnersmentioning
confidence: 99%