2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4868377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray-coating process in preparing PTFE-PPS composite super-hydrophobic coating

Abstract: In order to improve the performance of a liquid-floated rotor micro-gyroscope, the resistance of the moving interface between the rotor and the floating liquid must be reduced. Hydrophobic treatment can reduce the frictional resistance between such interfaces, therefore we proposed a method to prepare a poly-tetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-poly-phenylene sulphide (PPS) composite super-hydrophobic coating, based on a spraying process. This method can quickly prepare a continuous, uniform PTFE-PPS composite super-hyd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eq. (1) can be rearranged for a mono-dispersed coating at its CCP to read as: P cr m = 4sin˛c r cos 3 2 − Â − ˛c r d 2 6 m − sin 2˛c r (2) where m = 6 d Lm 2 is the SVF of the mono-dispersed coating. As mentioned in Part I, for mono-dispersed coatings with constant YLCAs, the critical IA, ˛c r , is independent of particle size (depends only on the SVF) [10].…”
Section: Critical Capillary Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eq. (1) can be rearranged for a mono-dispersed coating at its CCP to read as: P cr m = 4sin˛c r cos 3 2 − Â − ˛c r d 2 6 m − sin 2˛c r (2) where m = 6 d Lm 2 is the SVF of the mono-dispersed coating. As mentioned in Part I, for mono-dispersed coatings with constant YLCAs, the critical IA, ˛c r , is independent of particle size (depends only on the SVF) [10].…”
Section: Critical Capillary Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced cost of manufacturing has played an important role in making spray-on granular superhydrophobic coatings attractive alternatives to superhydrophobic surfaces produced via microfabrication (see e.g., [1][2][3]). Such surfaces can be used for applications ranging from self-cleaning and drag reduction to corrosion resistance and heat transfer [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, two are the main approaches: roughening a PTFE surface to achieve the superhydrophobicity, such as by plasma etching [42], templating [43], sand paper [44], sanding [45], laser technologies [46][47][48]; or by deposition on substrate of a thin film of PTFE by a pulsed laser deposition [49], RF plasma sputtering [50], RF-magnetron sputtering [51], supercritical CO 2 [52], electrospinning [53], and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [54]. Today, spray coating is not widespread; however, this method has the advantage of being simple, with a high efficiency and obtaining a good hydrophobicity and, when used, a final heat treatment is often required [55,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a large number of low surface tension polymer membranes, such as acrylics, fluorinated polymers and siloxanes, have been synthesized and applied in superhydrophobic surfaces. 14,19–22 On the other hand, superhydrophobicity can be further enhanced by hierarchical roughness on the substrate with nanoparticles (e.g., SiO 2 , 16,23–25 TiO 2 , 26 ZnO 27,28 ) through techniques such as chemical vapor deposition, 29 wet-chemical coating, 30 chemical bonds, 31,32 etc. SiO 2 nanoparticles have a large specific surface area and good dispersion performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%