1997
DOI: 10.2514/2.5156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray Characteristics of Liquid Jet Traversing Subsonic Airstreams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, which is consistent with the great number of experimental studies devoted to jet atomisation in cross flow (Oda et al 1994;Inamura and Nagai 1997;Wu et al 1998). Such studies have been conducted for injectors of smaller size, many of which consider fuel jets and mixing of liquid propellants in the combustion process.…”
Section: Drop Pattern Sizesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…, which is consistent with the great number of experimental studies devoted to jet atomisation in cross flow (Oda et al 1994;Inamura and Nagai 1997;Wu et al 1998). Such studies have been conducted for injectors of smaller size, many of which consider fuel jets and mixing of liquid propellants in the combustion process.…”
Section: Drop Pattern Sizesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore, an introduction and literature review into the subject of liquid jets breakup in a transverse gas flow (crossflow) is provided here (see Figure 17). It is known that the liquid jet flattens and bends in the crossflow direction due to the presence of the crossflow dynamic pressure [168][169][170][171][172][173][174]. As it is demonstrated in Figure 17, the spray field generated by a jet in crossflow can be divided into three regions: (1) intact liquid column; (2) ligaments; and (3) droplets [173][174][175][176].…”
Section: Liquid Jet In Crossflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ratio is important as it is proportional to the ratio of droplet thermal inertia to heat transfer rate. The experimental relationship between water flow rate and droplet SMD for several spray nozzles [15][16][17] at atmospheric pressure are shown in Figure 9. These measurements indicate that it is not easy to simultaneously achieve large liquid flow rate and small drop size TABLE II.…”
Section: B Influence Of Spray Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%