2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.08.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spousal similarities in cardiometabolic risk factors: A cross-sectional comparison between Dutch and Japanese data from two large biobank studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were required to answer the following question: "If you are living with family members who are participating in this TMM Project, please specify all their names and birthdays and your relationships with them (your spouse, father, mother, children, grandchildren, children's spouses, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and others) with their consent." Based on these responses, if a participant's spouse was identi ed as a TMM CommCohort Study participant, then the spouse and the participant were de ned as a spouse pair [20]. However, in this study, we created new random male-female using the original spouse pairs.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All participants were required to answer the following question: "If you are living with family members who are participating in this TMM Project, please specify all their names and birthdays and your relationships with them (your spouse, father, mother, children, grandchildren, children's spouses, father-in-law, mother-in-law, and others) with their consent." Based on these responses, if a participant's spouse was identi ed as a TMM CommCohort Study participant, then the spouse and the participant were de ned as a spouse pair [20]. However, in this study, we created new random male-female using the original spouse pairs.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding physical activity, metabolic equivalent (MET) hours/day were calculated by multiplying the MET score for a speci c activity by the number of hours spent on that activity per day. For each cohort, we used the 80th percentile of the men's MET hours/day as a cutoff for dividing physical activity levels into two categories: (1) su ciently active (≥ 80th percentile of men's MET hours/day) and ( 2) inactive (< 80th percentile of men's MET hours/day) [20].…”
Section: Lifestyle Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations