IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477)
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2003.1293757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPOT5 geometric image quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, a horizontal error of about 15 m was found for the ZY-3 stereo imagery [8]. Similar investigations have been carried out for various images, such as SPOT [9,10] and Pleiades [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Meanwhile, a horizontal error of about 15 m was found for the ZY-3 stereo imagery [8]. Similar investigations have been carried out for various images, such as SPOT [9,10] and Pleiades [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…First, the EFP Multi-functional bundle adjustment can process not only the long image (about 1000 km), but also the short image (at least 60 km) using whole three intersection areas . Second, during photographing, there are low-frequency errors of the attitude determination system (Wang Renxiang et al, 2011), which may be caused by in-flight time and latitude using star tracker (Bouillon et al, 2003). This phenomenon will make the exterior orientation parameters involving the errors of low-frequency and lead to the large errors of position.…”
Section: The Efp Multi-functional Bundle Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon will make the exterior orientation parameters involving the errors of low-frequency and lead to the large errors of position. In SPOT5 satellite, the latitudinal model (Bouillon et al, 2003) was proposed to correct attitude using approximately 20 calibration sites data. However, the EFP Multi-functional bundle adjustment can compensate lowfrequency errors using stereo image themselves without the calibration sites data.…”
Section: The Efp Multi-functional Bundle Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the results in Figure 10 that there exists obvious variation in the direct geolocation accuracy with the imaging time along the latitude in the imaging data, and the positioning accuracy fluctuated slowly within one strip along the latitude and descended on average from RMSE-Plane 3 pixels on 2 July 2016, to RMSE-Plane 10 pixels on 30 August 2016. SPOT5 personnel established a latitudinal model to take into account this variation and guarantee the consistency of location performance based on approximately 20 calibration sites with a worldwide distribution [32]. Given the limited number of high quality testfields in China, it is necessary to conduct research on the local coherence under a few GCPs or even without to determine the sources of the effects and perturbations as well as their frequencies and magnitudes.…”
Section: Aspects Of Geometrical Accuracy Assessment Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%