2015
DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.15447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spot Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Preeclampsia as an Alternative for 24-Hour Urine Protein

Abstract: Background: Proteinuria is a major component of preeclampsia. Urine protein measurement after 24-hour urine collection is the traditional standard method for the detection of proteinuria. It is timeconsuming. As an alternative, random spot sampling for a urine protein to creatinine (P/C) ratio has been investigated. Aims: The aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the protein to creatinine ratio (P/C) compared with 24-hour urine collection for the detection of remarkable proteinuria and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
38
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
38
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Furthermore, its collection is time-consuming and cumbersome for patients and nursing staff, leading to inaccurate collections and false results in 13%-54% of the analyses, as concluded by Côté et al 4 In obstetric practice nowadays, the PCR is already used in multiple countries to diagnose significant proteinuria when pre-eclampsia is sus- These recommendations are based on numerous studies suggesting that the PCR is a good alternative to the 24HP in pre-eclampsia. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] There is still controversy with some studies concluding that, on the contrary, it is not a proper diagnostic test, because of poor sensitivity and specificity 21 or poor correlation with the 24HP due to the variety of results of the PCR over a 24-hour period. 22 Other studies determined that a PCR can be used but only as a "rule-out" test (as the AUC is too low when comparing the PCR to the 24HP) 23 or to assess the magnitude of proteinuria, especially in severe pre-eclampsia, 18 even if the rate of the PCR does not seem to be predictive of adverse pregnancy outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Furthermore, its collection is time-consuming and cumbersome for patients and nursing staff, leading to inaccurate collections and false results in 13%-54% of the analyses, as concluded by Côté et al 4 In obstetric practice nowadays, the PCR is already used in multiple countries to diagnose significant proteinuria when pre-eclampsia is sus- These recommendations are based on numerous studies suggesting that the PCR is a good alternative to the 24HP in pre-eclampsia. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] There is still controversy with some studies concluding that, on the contrary, it is not a proper diagnostic test, because of poor sensitivity and specificity 21 or poor correlation with the 24HP due to the variety of results of the PCR over a 24-hour period. 22 Other studies determined that a PCR can be used but only as a "rule-out" test (as the AUC is too low when comparing the PCR to the 24HP) 23 or to assess the magnitude of proteinuria, especially in severe pre-eclampsia, 18 even if the rate of the PCR does not seem to be predictive of adverse pregnancy outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eigbefoh et al, showed that there is a strong correlation between random urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio and quantitation of 24-hour proteinuria with sensitivity of 92% specificity for the protein/creatinine ratio was 86%. [15][16][17] Sami Jan et al, concluded that spot urine protein to creatinine ratio is an accurate, reliable and steady fast, time saving test which can be used as an alternative method for evaluation of proteinuria in pregnancy induced hypertension and it can substitute 24 hours urinary protein excretion estimation in clinical practice. 18 A cross sectional study of 920 hospitalized patients with suspicion of preeclampsia, Mishra et al, concluded that spot UPCR can be used as a reasonable alternative to 24 hours urine protein estimation with a sensitivity and specificity of 98.1% and 98.6% positive predictive value and negative predictive value 97.4% and 99.2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors that might have been relevant but were not assessed included women's level of activity before the urine was collected. Although 24-h collection of urine is the gold standard for quantifying urinary albumin, a spot urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio was used in this study because it was more likely to reflect clinical practice for a screening test, and because an attempted 24-h collection would very likely had been futile and erroneous (Demirci et al, 2015). Some of the past studies have shown excellent correlation between spot urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and albumin excretion in 24-h urine sample in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia (Morris et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%