Sportsmen’s Groin: Groin Pain: Always a Case for the Orthopedic Surgeon?

Muschaweck, Ulrike; Berger, Luise

doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7925-4_6

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Every year, around 800,000 repairs are accomplished. To avoid complications, medical practitioners advise that all symptomatic hernias should be repaired 4,5 . With the objective of tension-free repair and defect closure, an open or laparoscopic method is commonly performed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Outcome of Desarda’s Repair with Lichenstein Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia

Mehmood¹,

Raza²,

Butt³

et al. 2022

PJMHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: to compare the outcomes of lichenstein mesh repair with desarda’s repair with in inguinal hernia. Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted at department of surgery (Hospital name) on 64 patients divided in two groups, group A (Desdra) and Group B (lichenstein). Primary outcomes were surgical site infection, seroma and postop pain assessment on 7th postop day. Secondary outcomes were mean hospital stay, return to work and mean operative time. Results: Desarda’s group had significantly less operative times as compared to lichenstein group 40.38±3.26 vs 45.09±3.97 (p=0.0001). SSI, seroma and recurrence of hernia in both groups were not statistically significant. Mean postop pain on 7th day, mean hospital stay and return to work was statistically significant in both groups. Conclusion: Desarda tissue-based repair, which is equally effective as the traditional Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair, can be used to successfully repair primary inguinal hernias without mesh implantation. Keywords: Desarda’s Repair, Lichenstein Mesh Repair, Inguinal Hernia

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Outcome of Desarda’s Repair with Lichenstein Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia

Mehmood¹,

Raza²,

Butt³

et al. 2022

PJMHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These groin hernias can be divided into indirect, direct, and femoral based on location. [1][2][3] There exists a wide range of techniques available ranging from open techniques, laparo-endoscopic and robotic assisted approaches. As such, the operative technique remains the choice of the individual surgeon.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study To Assess Desarda Vs Lichtenstein Technique For The Treatment Of Primary Inguinal Hernia

Paliwal¹,

Katkar²,

Nangare³

2022

Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The present study was conducted for assessing and comparing the efficacy of Desarda vs Lichtenstein technique for thetreatment of primary inguinal hernia.Materials & Methods: 100 patients scheduled to undergo treatment for inguinal hernia were enrolled. Complete demographic andclinical details of all the patients was obtained. All the patients were randomized into two study groups: Group A (50 patients)-undergoing treatment by Desarda technique, and Group B (50 patients)- undergoing treatment by Lichtenstein technique. Forperforming Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair, a polypropylene mesh was trimmed to fit the inguinal floor. Chronic pain wasassessed on a VAS score of 0 to 10 with 7 to 10 indicating strong pain while 3 to 6 indicating moderate pain. All the results weresubjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software.Results: Group A and group B subjects took 15.3 days and 14.2 days respectively for returning to basic activity. Group A and groupB subjects took 5.1 days and 8.3 days respectively for returning to home activity (p- value < 0.05). Mean hospital stay was 3.2 daysand 2.9 days among subjects of group A and group B respectively. Foreign body sensation was felt in one patient each of both thestudy groups. Incidence of seroma formation was higher among the patients of group B in comparison to patients of group A. Meanoperative time was significantly lower among patients of group A.Conclusion: Outcome is better for Desarda technique in comparison to Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinalhernia.

show abstract

Sportsmen’s Groin: Groin Pain: Always a Case for the Orthopedic Surgeon?

Cited by 2 publications

References 32 publications

Comparison of Outcome of Desarda’s Repair with Lichenstein Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia

Comparison of Outcome of Desarda’s Repair with Lichenstein Mesh Repair in Inguinal Hernia

A Study To Assess Desarda Vs Lichtenstein Technique For The Treatment Of Primary Inguinal Hernia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About