2008
DOI: 10.1002/for.1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sports forecasting: a comparison of the forecast accuracy of prediction markets, betting odds and tipsters

Abstract: This article compares the forecast accuracy of different methods, namely prediction markets, tipsters and betting odds, and assesses the ability of prediction markets and tipsters to generate profits systematically in a betting market. We present the results of an empirical study that uses data from 678-837 games of three seasons of the German premier soccer league. Prediction markets and betting odds perform equally well in terms of forecasting accuracy, but both methods strongly outperform tipsters. A weight… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
108
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the marginal evaluation cost of each idea is low, the cumulative evaluation cost when thousands of ideas are posted can be tremendous. Community based voting methodologies like simple discussion forums, community ratings (Carbone, Contreras, Hernández, & Gomez-Perez, 2011;Frey, Lüthje, & Haag, 2011) or more complex methodologies like prediction markets (Blohm, Riedl, Leimeister, & Krcmar, 2011;Spann & Skiera, 2009) that are based on stock-market trading algorithms can help to solve this challenge. Any assessment system based on a community scoring model, in which ideas can be awarded with a specific number of points, can help selecting the best idea (Hüsig & Kohn, 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the marginal evaluation cost of each idea is low, the cumulative evaluation cost when thousands of ideas are posted can be tremendous. Community based voting methodologies like simple discussion forums, community ratings (Carbone, Contreras, Hernández, & Gomez-Perez, 2011;Frey, Lüthje, & Haag, 2011) or more complex methodologies like prediction markets (Blohm, Riedl, Leimeister, & Krcmar, 2011;Spann & Skiera, 2009) that are based on stock-market trading algorithms can help to solve this challenge. Any assessment system based on a community scoring model, in which ideas can be awarded with a specific number of points, can help selecting the best idea (Hüsig & Kohn, 2011).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been quite extensive research on the effectiveness of league football betting markets in the sense that betting odds reflect the available information (e.g. Croxson & Reade, 2014;Deschamps & Gergaud, 2007;Dobson & Goddard, 2011;Forrest et al, 2005;Goddard, 2005;Goddard & Asimakopoulos, 2004;Spann & Skiera, 2009) and consequently on the quality of the information when using betting quotas as a proxy for team strength. While there is evidence that bookmakers possibly try to exploit behavioral biases of bettors, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is evidence that bookmakers possibly try to exploit behavioral biases of bettors, e.g. a "sentiment bias" leading to worse quotas for popular teams (Braun & Kvasnicka, 2013;, the overall picture tends to support high degrees of efficiency in the market (Croxson & Reade, 2014;Simmons, 2013;Spann & Skiera, 2009). Betting odds for weekend games are collected Friday afternoons, and on Tuesday afternoons for midweek games.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Yang et al [60] establishes a prediction of sports betting consumption in the province of Sichuan to improve future promotional strategies. Studies by Spann and Skiera [61] include a comparative analysis of diverse prediction methods in the betting market or the application of predictive methods (ARIMA) to evaluate time series data (1999-2001) in social networks or sports debate forums, such as Sport Unicycling [62].…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%