Sport management or the management of sport? Reframing the theory debate

Scoping practical implications and managerial relevance in sport management

“…Editors, in turn, should ensure that these assessments are considered in the decision-making process regarding publication. Further, establishing specific requirements within author guidelines could aid in bridging this gap, as Lachance et al. (2023) have done in creating a guide for framing theoretical implications in research.…”

“…To date, there has been scant conversation about what constitutes practical implications in sport management, even though this custom seems ubiquitous throughout the research dissemination practice. As the field evolves, efforts have been made to establish a framework highlighting theoretical contributions in sport management research, as proposed by Lachance et al . (2023), directing scholars towards discerning the what, how, why, as well as the who, when, and where of these contributions.…”

“…, 2010). While strong theories serve as an important, critical foundation for moving the field forward (Doherty, 2013a; Lachance et al. , 2023; Zhang et al.…”

“…, 2019). Building upon efforts in the field of sport management research, which have focused on developing a framework for theoretical contributions (Lachance et al ., 2023) and guiding researchers in identifying the various facets of their theoretical work, it is evident that similar work is essential to frame practical contributions stemming from research efforts. In this context, Jaworski's 2011 paper titled “On managerial relevance” establishes a framework that delves into the concept of managerial relevance in the context of marketing, offering valuable insights into how academic research can be aligned with the practical needs of managers and decision-makers in the field.…”