1948
DOI: 10.2307/2437748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sporogenesis and Embryo Sac Development of Hesperocallis and Leucocrinum in Relation to Their Systematic Position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The length and centromeric position of chromosomes vanes gradually (JIN 1986), and the karyotype is completely different from that of Hosm, which is bimodal, possessing x = 30. The difference between Hemerocallis and Hosta is supported also by embryological observations (CAVE 1948).…”
Section: Hemerocallidaceaementioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The length and centromeric position of chromosomes vanes gradually (JIN 1986), and the karyotype is completely different from that of Hosm, which is bimodal, possessing x = 30. The difference between Hemerocallis and Hosta is supported also by embryological observations (CAVE 1948).…”
Section: Hemerocallidaceaementioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, the former includes only 18 short pairs, while the latter includes 24. Embryologically the genera are similar (CAVE 1948).…”
Section: Hostaceaementioning
confidence: 93%
“…For many years Hosta was associated with Hemerocallis, Hesperocallis, and Leucocrinum (Krause, 1930;Hutchinson, 1934). Hesperocallis does resemble both Hosta and Yucca-Agave in embryological features and in having a bimodal karyotype, but Hemerocallis and Leucocrinum are very different in these features and probably not closely related to Hosta or to each other (Cave, 1948(Cave, , 1970.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosome number is n = 24, with 5-6 very large and 19-18 small chromosomes (Kubitzki 1998b ). Cave ( 1948Cave ( , 1970 discussed similarities between embryology and karyotypes of Hesperocallis and Agavaceae. In the past, the classification of Hesperocallis was generally uncertain.…”
Section: Early Diverging Members Of Agavaceaementioning
confidence: 99%