2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00329.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPORE RELEASE IN ACROCHAETIUM SP. (RHODOPHYTA) IS BACTERIALLY CONTROLLED1

Abstract: The facultative red algal epiphyte Acrochaetium sp. liberated spores preferentially and recruited more successfully in laboratory cultures when its host Gracilaria chilensis C. J. Bird, McLachlan et E. C. Oliveira was present. The same effect was also induced by cell-free medium from G. chilensis, suggesting it contained a molecular signal. Antibiotics prevented spore release in Acrochaetium sp., even when G. chilensis was present, suggesting a prokaryotic origin of the signal. Simultaneous application of N-bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weinberger et al (2007) reported that C 4 -HSL potentially influenced the carpospore liberation capacity in Acrochaetium sp. While, the present study found that both C 4 - and C 6 -HSL equally contributed to carpospore liberation from G. dura .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weinberger et al (2007) reported that C 4 -HSL potentially influenced the carpospore liberation capacity in Acrochaetium sp. While, the present study found that both C 4 - and C 6 -HSL equally contributed to carpospore liberation from G. dura .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable example of such an interaction is the dependence of several green algae on the presence of particular bacteria to develop a normal morphology (Provasoli and Pintner, 1980;Nakanishi et al, 1996;Matsuo et al, 2003;Marshall et al, 2006). Algal-associated bacteria have also been shown to induce the release and settlement of algal spores (Joint et al, 2007;Weinberger et al, 2007), to positively influence algal growth and provide essential nutrients (KeshtacherLiebson et al, 1995;Croft et al, 2006), and to induce settlement of sea urchin and other larvae (Johnson and Sutton, 1994;Huggett et al, 2006Huggett et al, , 2008. Examples such as these indicate that an epiphytic bacterial community is important to the algal host's normal function and, by extension, the ecology of the habitats in which they exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, many seaweeds live in close association with numerous epiphytic bacteria, which control morphological development (Fries and Iwasaki 1976;Marshall et. al 2006;Provasoli and Pintner 1980;Tatewaki et al 1983) or are linked with various metabolic functions (Chisholm et al 1996;Croft et al 2005;Head and Carpenter 1975;Staufenberger et al 2008;Weinberger 2007), and Bryopsis seems no exception (Kan et al 1999). Whereas the usage of axenic cultures is quite common for micro-algae, for the study of marine macro-algae this is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%