1955
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(55)90016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sporadic E propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1955
1955
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strength has its maximum value at a distance of about 1,500 km because, while r decreases with d, the height gain of the antenna decreases with d above l ,500 km under the conditions given. This example gives a good explanation of the results of investigation of Es propagation in the United States, as reported byGerson (1955].…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…The strength has its maximum value at a distance of about 1,500 km because, while r decreases with d, the height gain of the antenna decreases with d above l ,500 km under the conditions given. This example gives a good explanation of the results of investigation of Es propagation in the United States, as reported byGerson (1955].…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…In such records of complex signals, however, it should be noticed that the distance dependence of signal level is liable to be flattened so as to show a high level at a shorter distance. Figure 16 shows a frequency distribution with distance of 50 MHz radio contacts of 12,500 instances [ Gerson, 1955], that of 3,228 TV-DX reports [Smith, 1957], and the above estimated probabilities on 50 and 70 MHz signals under appropriate parameters. They agree, approximately, with each other, but the sporadi½-E events appear skewed toward shorter distances than estimated, which might, at least in part, be due to the geographical boundaries of the tests.…”
Section: Factor Of Decreasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the US Gerson [1955]. andSmith [1957] collected reports of sporadi½-E events from 1949 through 1952 and from 1950 to 1953 in the US, and derived frequency distributions of the events with distance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%