2003
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.60.5.767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Mimicking Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

Abstract: This case cautions against relying solely on T2- and diffusion-weighted pulvinar hyperintensity and clinical features to differentiate between vCJD and sCJD, and further supports established diagnostic criteria for vCJD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Young sCJD patients are being continually reported in many European countries, Australia, North America, Japan and others, based on the national surveillance data. [18][19][20][21][22][23] The identifying rate of young sCJD patients below 40 year-old in our surveillance system is comparable with that of other countries.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…17 Young sCJD patients are being continually reported in many European countries, Australia, North America, Japan and others, based on the national surveillance data. [18][19][20][21][22][23] The identifying rate of young sCJD patients below 40 year-old in our surveillance system is comparable with that of other countries.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Signal intensity abnormality in the thalamus was seen in 40% of fCJD cases in our study and is also seen in sCJD. 37,42,43 In vCJD, the thalamic signal intensity on FLAIR is generally believed to be brighter or of greater magnitude compared with the signal intensity of the caudate and putamen. 44 In sCJD, the thalamic signal intensity is felt to be equal or lower in magnitude compared with the caudate and putamen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although high signal changes in the pulvinar thalami have also been reported in sporadic CJD [42,55], they are generally less pronounced than in the caudate head or putamen, whereas in variant CJD the highest signal is always in the pulvinar. The radiological differential diagnosis for the pulvinar sign includes rare cases of post-infectious encephalitis, cat-scratch disease, intracranial hypertension and Alpers syndrome (progressive infantile poliodystrophy, a rare genetically determined mitochondrial encephalomyelopathy) [54].…”
Section: Mri In Variant Cjdmentioning
confidence: 99%