2018
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPOP-Mutated/CHD1-Deleted Lethal Prostate Cancer and Abiraterone Sensitivity

Abstract: deletions and mutations frequently cooccur in prostate cancer with lower frequencies reported in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We monitored CHD1 expression during disease progression and assessed the molecular and clinical characteristics of-deleted/-mutated metastatic CRPC (mCRPC). We identified 89 patients with mCRPC who had hormone-naive and castration-resistant tumor samples available: These were analyzed for CHD1, PTEN, and ERG expression by IHC. status was determined by targeted next-gener… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
78
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
78
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing evidence indicates that SPOP mutations often cause elevation of its degradation substrates including AR and transcriptional cofactors such as TRIM24, SRC3, and BET proteins (An et al , ; Geng et al , ; Groner et al , ; Blattner et al , ; Zhang et al , ). Consistent with the finding that SPOP‐mutated specimens acquire highest AR activity among different subtypes of PCa (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, ), SPOP‐mutated PCa cells are highly sensitive to treatment of androgen inhibitory agent abiraterone when SPOP mutation is co‐occurred with CHD1 deletion (Boysen et al , ), supporting the notion of oncogene addiction. In contrast, PCa‐associated SPOP hotspot mutations such as F133V and W131R confer resistance to BET inhibitors due to upregulation of BET proteins and aberrant occupancy of BRD4 in the genome (Dai et al , ; Zhang et al , ), implying that specific strategies are needed to effectively treat patients with SPOP‐mutated PCa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Increasing evidence indicates that SPOP mutations often cause elevation of its degradation substrates including AR and transcriptional cofactors such as TRIM24, SRC3, and BET proteins (An et al , ; Geng et al , ; Groner et al , ; Blattner et al , ; Zhang et al , ). Consistent with the finding that SPOP‐mutated specimens acquire highest AR activity among different subtypes of PCa (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, ), SPOP‐mutated PCa cells are highly sensitive to treatment of androgen inhibitory agent abiraterone when SPOP mutation is co‐occurred with CHD1 deletion (Boysen et al , ), supporting the notion of oncogene addiction. In contrast, PCa‐associated SPOP hotspot mutations such as F133V and W131R confer resistance to BET inhibitors due to upregulation of BET proteins and aberrant occupancy of BRD4 in the genome (Dai et al , ; Zhang et al , ), implying that specific strategies are needed to effectively treat patients with SPOP‐mutated PCa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In further support of this theory is that, in addition to relatively abundant PTEN loss seen in our cohort, all of the cases that had genomic analysis performed showed at least one genetic alteration that has been associated with invasive, and often aggressive, PCa. These alterations include MYC amplification, genomic losses in CHD1 , TP53 , RB1 , chromosome 8p, and BRCA2 mutation . In addition, the oncogenic PIK3CA mutation identified in one of our cases (case 11) has been demonstrated in a mouse model to be sufficient to cause invasive PCa and cooperates with PTEN loss in the development of castrate resistant disease (CRPC) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…15 alterations such as PTEN or CHD1 deletion remain undetectable when ctDNA constitutes a few percent of total cfDNA. Many of the alterations identified by either cfDNA or tissue sequencing alone have clinical relevance, from DDR gene defects and potential sensitivity to PARPi or immunotherapy [25,26], to TP53 and SPOP mutations that infer poor and favourable prognosis, respectively [10,27,28]. Therefore, the optimal approach for correlative studies or biomarker development in the de novo mCSPC setting should incorporate both tissue and plasma analyses, or risk undersampling disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%