1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1621-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous Transfer of Lipids between Membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…POPC and DHPC were selected to favorably accommodate BODIPY-labeled SL and C 18 -DiI. ,, As shown in Figure A, SL-donor and -acceptor model membranes formed by dilution of 0.5 q -value mixtures support robust SL transfer. Notably, almost no increase in BODIPY-SL emission occurs until transfer protein is added, confirming very slow spontaneous SL migration to acceptors in agreement with earlier findings involving conventionally prepared membrane vesicles. Also, combining SL-donors with only protein fails to significantly increase BODIPY-SL emission unless followed by addition of acceptors showing that protein binding of BODIPY-SL does not explain the FRET response. Rather, the low “catalytic” amounts of GLTP act in “shuttle-like” fashion to transfer Me 4 -BODIPY-GalCer continuously from the SL-donors to the excess acceptors until dynamic equilibrium is approached (∼20 min).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…POPC and DHPC were selected to favorably accommodate BODIPY-labeled SL and C 18 -DiI. ,, As shown in Figure A, SL-donor and -acceptor model membranes formed by dilution of 0.5 q -value mixtures support robust SL transfer. Notably, almost no increase in BODIPY-SL emission occurs until transfer protein is added, confirming very slow spontaneous SL migration to acceptors in agreement with earlier findings involving conventionally prepared membrane vesicles. Also, combining SL-donors with only protein fails to significantly increase BODIPY-SL emission unless followed by addition of acceptors showing that protein binding of BODIPY-SL does not explain the FRET response. Rather, the low “catalytic” amounts of GLTP act in “shuttle-like” fashion to transfer Me 4 -BODIPY-GalCer continuously from the SL-donors to the excess acceptors until dynamic equilibrium is approached (∼20 min).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Interestingly, fast spontaneous lipid transfer via collisions among polymer-bounded nanodiscs has also recently been reported in agreement with transfer mechanisms reported for bilayer vesicles at high concentrations over three decades ago. , Lowering the lipid model membrane concentrations or adding small amounts of charged lipid mitigates the model membrane collisional contacts and vastly reduces the rate of nonspecific spontaneous lipid transfer. , In recent studies of DMPC/DHPC or DPPC/DHPC bicelles containing 5 mol % of negatively charged phosphatidylglycerol, , the spontaneous transfer rates for the DMPC or DPPC bicelle bilayer-matrix lipid were slow and with their half-times differing from several hours to hundreds of hours, respectively, in agreement with earlier bilayer vesicles studies. The findings suggest a solubility-driven exchange via lipid monomer transfer through the aqueous medium, in agreement with studies of conventional bilayer vesicles , and lipoprotein nanodiscs …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Excitation of AV- (370 nm) or BODIPY-sphingolipid (460 nm) results in minimal emission at 415 nm or 503 nm, respectively due to resonance energy transfer to nearby Per-PC or C18-DiI, respectively. Addition of approximately tenfold excess of sonicated POPC acceptor vesicles or POPC/DHPC bicelles produces little change in fluorescence signal, yielding a “no protein” baseline response for spontaneously transferred AV-sphingolipid, which is very slow ( 83 , 84 ). Protein addition triggers a sudden, hyperbolic increase in AV or BODIPY emission intensity (415 nm or 503 nm, respectively) reflecting the FRET decrease due to protein transport of fluorescent sphingolipid to receiver (acceptor) vesicles and separation from nontransferable Per-PC or C18-DiI lipids in sphingolipid-source vesicles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique made possible the visualization the movement and distribution of labelled lipid molecules in living cells (Pagano & Sleight, 1985). As for lipid transfer or exchange, there is a lack of a unifying mechanism and three different routes are possible: (1) transport of lipids by endocytosis and vesicle membrane flow; (2) energy‐dependent or independent transport of lipid molecules by special carrier‐proteins; and (3) spontaneous transport of lipid monomers by diffusion or by direct contact due to cell organelle collision (Brown, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choline‐containing molecules move spontaneously from the exterior medium to the outer layer of the plasma membrane (Sleight & Pagano, 1984) but, because of the absence of specific ATPases with translocase activity, it moves from the cell surface to internal compartments by endocytosis (Voelker, 1990). Conversely, the aminophospholipids are moved from the exoplasmic to the cytoplasmic portion of the membrane bilayer by lipid translocators, named flippases, and reach the different compartments either by binding to the so‐called phospholipid transfer proteins or by spontaneous diffusion through the cytoplasm in an energy‐independent way (Brown, 1990; Cleves et al ., 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%